Barrera beat Hammed because he press him a lot. Mayweather would not touch Hammed for the whole fight with his one punch combo. Hammed had similar speed to PBF but much bigger KO power.
Barrera beat Hamed because his technique was far superior. And you PBF detractors seem to forget that he hunted and destroyed at 130 and 135. Hamed would have been beaten to a pulp. Take Barrera's technique and add power that can shake natural welterweights a la DLH, and Hamed is in for a long and painful night.
Isn't the difference between PBF at 130 and 150? Would 157 DLH be shaken by 130 Floyd? Wasn't Hamed faster at 130 than DLH at 157?
Between PBF and Barrera: Technique - PBF Natural Skill - PBF Power - PBF Handspeed - PBF Chin - Barrera, though PBF has never been stopped or SERIOUSLY hurt So, 2+2=4 in my world. How bout yours?
No contest..Hamed was made for Floyd.Even if The Prince did slip a big one in.No body is going to kayo Floyd with just one shot.
Hamed is everything u dont want ur fighter to fight like hands at his nuts,no lowerbody movement,jumps in with his shots alot. Mayweather is so superior its almost funny with his technique and defense plus hes taller. Mayweather embarrsingly easy UD.
Floyd always was and always is a great body puncher. He will eventually get to the head after a few lead rights and jabs to the body, and the boy was lightning fast at 130, and had 1 punch KO power at that weight as well.