Hamed vs Mayweather at 130

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stinky gloves, Jun 18, 2007.


  1. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    2
    Oct 30, 2005
    Floyd hammers and schools Hamed worse than MAB. All Hamed has is a puncher's chance, and against Floyd, that's not an optimistic scenario.

    To me, the more interesting fantasy fight is Hamed vs. Pacqiuao.
     
  2. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    WOW!! Finally found a matchup where I'm rooting for Floyd:lol: :lol:

    There's no question here, absolutely unbelievable and almost inconceivable as to how anyone could IMAGINE Prince "The Joke" Hamed being in any way COMPETITIVE with Floyd.


    Hamed had NO SKILLZ, all he had was a big punch at feather. He was outclassed, exposed, and embarrassed by Barerra and I'd GUARANTEE that the little arab frog would get beaten soundly and EMBARRASSED worse than before.
     
  3. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    :patschWhat the hell are you talking about. Barrera won b/c he was patient, methodical and kept a high guard while Hamed was trying to land one big punch. I remember when this fight was talked about being made. Ssimply put, Hamed is too small to fight PBF at any time. Hamed was 5'3 and was small for a featherweight, much less a superfeatherweight.
     
  4. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    Floyd by UD.

    Hamed's speed/power keeps him in the fight but he gets undressed in a clear decision loss.
     
  5. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    No skillz? Just b/c he was unorthodox? That defense took a ton of skill and was made possible by his always great footwork- Hameds greatest and most underrated asset.
     
  6. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007

    Barerra SHOWED HIS SKILL LEVEL!!

    How well did unorthodox fair there??:lol: Compared to PBF? Please!!!


    All Hamed was was a PUNCHER at feather. Instead of developing an all around game with REAL SKILL he relied on his dancing, antics, and BULL****!!:good A lot of good it did him too:lol:


    Footwork??:lol: Ok.. I guess the frog could dance a two step but bending in half like GUMBY still doesnt equate to BOXING SKILL:D
     
  7. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    Floyd would probably win, but I cant see him stopping Naz. I think he'd be too cautious too risk it as Naz only has a punchers chance.
     
  8. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Damn this could have been history, two fighters with the biggest mouth fighting each other? :lol: :lol: :lol:

    :huh :think
     
  9. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,145
    Jun 23, 2005
    Exactly, Hamed is beaten to a pulp in this one. I doubt Hamed could really hurt PBF. Floyd took Oscar's punches at 154 and didn't blink he'd do the same with Hamed at 130.:deal PBF by wide UD or TKO because Hamed's corner throws in the towel.
     
  10. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Mayweather hit pretty good at 130, Mayweather TKO 8 over that overrated Hamed.
     
  11. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007

    Barrera, Marquez, Morales, Pacquiao, PBF, and many, many more in the annals of boxing at 30 would have pounded that little toad into the embarrassment of retirement that MAB sent him too.

    Julian Jackson had more game, more skillz, and a better punch than Hamed. All he was missing was a CHIN.

    When it came time to step up to elite level?? Hamed was outclassed, embarrassed, and ran into retirement. He doesnt belong mentioned with guy's like Jackson or many other ATG fighters.

    Obviously, it takes some "skill', yet in Hamed's case it was more unorthodox movement because his power was great at that weight, to be a pro. Yet, the fact that he went out the way he did, speaks VOLUMES. The guy wasnt ATG or anywhere close to it.
     
  12. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Does anyone even read posts before posting themselves? I know PBF wouldve beaten Naz (go back and read), but to say he wasnt skillful is just moronic. Wow, oh my god, he lost to an atg, he must have NO SKILL:nut He won every title and was undisputed in a division that he was too small for just by tanting and dancing huh?
     
  13. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007


    Hamed is OVERRATED because of his power. His true assesment as a fighter can be better determined by how he performed vs MAB.
    Like I said, HOST of others that would have whipped Hamed as well.
     
  14. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,145
    Jun 23, 2005
    I think you're selling The Prince short here. Naz did a lot for the lower wieght classes love him or hate him, he brought attention to that class like no one has since. The Prince is what he is, a good undorthodox fighter with a hell of a punch and good defense but in the end he was good for boxing.
     
  15. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007

    Good 4 boxing??:lol:

    If you say so!!

    Then again, your a PBF fan, so I'm not really suprised you'll stand up for a guy like Hamed. If you love the **** talking, ten minute ring entrances, and hyperbole bull****?/ Then, your a Hamed fan:good


    I definitely dont see that as good for Boxing, nor do i see that Boxing has missed Hamed. The real ATG's at or near his weight were MAB, Marquez, Morales, and Pac and since they fight/fought each other and rematch like true Champs and Warrior's?? Missing Hamed is POINTLESS:good How in the name of god did Hamed do anything to overshadow, accomplish, or bring more attenetion than they did???:nut