Hamed WAS and IS still a fraud cos he's younger than Barrera and Juan Marquez...

What does it mean? Explain....

 

Hamed was good for the sport too bad Allah didn't bless him with a bigger pair of balls.

Think about it, If Hamed never punked out after the MAB fight, we could of had JMM, Morales, MAB , PAC and HAMED fighting each other ...............DAYUM!

We have already two great trilogies out of three of those guys and possibly a third one with PAC and JMM.

Think about the possibilities.!:deal

 

No intentions of insulting you personally, but I mean, the thread title is self-explanatory. That is idiotic. It's like saying "Ali's a fraud because he's younger than Louis". Now I know that's not the context or the meaning of what you said, but literally, it's the same damn thing. There are too many variables than to say "fighter a is a fraud because he retired and fighter b is older and is still fights".

 

Naseem Hamed was a wasted genius. The speed, the power, the skill were all there and he had so much potential to achieve so much in boxing. After he got beaten he didn't want it badly enough and that's the bottom line.

He quit too early, and that's a real shame because we were robbed of seeing what he might have become. "Fraud" is the wrong word. "Disappointment" is a better one. If you'd said that, Mr New, I don't think anyone would disagree.

 

What does Vegas having good boxing have to do with you saying this?

He also fought and won at MSG in New York. So I don't see how your answer or even your question has to do with how good Hamed was.

 

If it's not your problem and doesn't concern you, then why the thread?

 

Which is still not relevant to what you said about it "meaning something" that he lost in Vegas.

Either way, losing to an ATG doesn't make you a fraud.

 

Oh I get it. You aren't making any sense is the problem

Hamed WAS good. Why the hell would he fight anyone after being inactive for 6 years? What does his not fighting now have to do with how good he was years ago?

And as you well know (since you're an alias) I am not from Britain or Europe. So I could care less where he fights. Nor do I really care about Hamed. But you're thread is ridiculous.

 

It makes him a fighter who never rematched someone who beat him. Which happens alot BTW. Odd how you don't fight everyone twice in this sport.