By defintion, obviously yes. Hamed has 8-10 wins over "world class" fighters, and zero wins over "elite" or "ATG's" like Barrera. If you wan't to pick apart guys like McCullough, Ingle, whoever. Go ahead. Just try not to get your Soto's and your Vasquez's mixed up eh! and seriously, when did "memory" become the yardstick for measuring the quality of a fighter? :huh Everyone remembers Frank Bruno - so he must be GREAT right? :nut Another mouthy and poorly informed chump for my ignore list :hi:
Id agree with that. Its a shame people just want to chastise him for that one loss and disregard everything else he did.
ignore list? how sad are you son? boxing forums are for discussions, not to cry and ignore people when they beat you in an argument. And no, I think being world class and being world champion lost its connection when there were 8 world champs per weight class.
He never ****in did anything. Brunos win over McCall was probably better than all of Hameds put together :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
Its pointless talking to someone like you when you make statements like that. I take it you did not see McCall's first defence when he had a close fight with an ancient Larry Holmes and looked poor, infact if Holmes had not tired due his age i strongly believe he would of won the fight.
SHame his prime didn't continue for longer. It's a toss-up between he and Danny Lopez for the title of hardest ever FW puncher IMO
You didnt beat him in the argument, you said everyone he beat was a bum which is blatantly untrue as he went on to prove.