Hardcore Boxing Fans Still Don't Get It, Do You?!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Willie Maeket, Jan 17, 2016.


  1. Willie Maeket

    Willie Maeket "40 Acres and Mule" -General William T. Sherman Full Member

    13,894
    8,368
    Jun 22, 2015
    What Tyson Fury did last night was get himself some free American TV promotion. I see a lot of you snobby ****s commenting about a clown act. It's called entertainment unless you guys forgot they get paid to do this. If you wanna see people fight with their hearts go to prison, they fight for nothing in there, pro fighters are E-N-T-E-R-T-A-I-N-E-R-S.

    Fury talks ****, so what?
    Deontay has a fake persona, so what?
    Martin is the weakest champion since Douglas, so what?

    You watched anyway and you will keep watching because it is entertaining. There used to be 10 threads a day about Mayweather when he was retired the first time on here, and you guys still make them, why? Because you like his brand of showmanship. When he didn't do it during the MAY 2nd build up you guys were sad, you really were.:|

    You wanted him to do to Manny what he did to Ortiz, Hatton, and De La Hoya because you like ,no, you LOVE that ****. So next time remember why you watch. It's entertainment.
     
  2. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,445
    241,066
    Nov 23, 2013
    Here's a thread I did about a year and a half ago.


    The people on this forum have a very insular view of boxing, we are fanatics, what we want is the best always fighting the best, and little known underrated talents getting pushed, and the overrated hypejobs getting exposed. But.... a lot of what we want may not be entertaining to general audiences, so it doesn't happen and the promoters don't care, because we are not their key demographic, the casual fans seeking entertainment are.

    I see a lot of fans say "who cares what the casuals want", well without the casuals pouring money in, the sport wouldn't survive, the casual fans who know nothing are ironically the reason for the sport remaining successful. Most casual fans don't know anything about the sport except the few fighters that break through and become marquee names. Which means they're famous, and people will pay money for "important fights" based on name value and their level of stardom.

    Without the cash generated by PPV buys and ratings brought in by HBO and Showtime viewers, the sport would atrophy and fade away, becoming irrelevant. HBO and Showtime are pay services, if they take money from their budget that they receive from subscribers and put on a subpar telecast that no one watches, they will go out of business, their main investors are the subscribers, without us they cease to exist. If we are not adequately entertained we drop the subscription and the money goes away, therefore they can't create content anymore. Which means they must take into consideration what the general audiences want, which is to be "entertained", because the more viewers and PPV buys, the more money they make, and the more live boxing broadcasts they can produce. So the very livelihood of our favorite sport is predicated on the rise and fall of the viewership of the casual fan, who's sole reason for watching is to be entertained.

    Unfortunately the casual fan knows very little, they know Mayweather, Pacquiao, Cotto, Canelo, maybe Hopkins and that's about it. They don't even know who Guerrero, Bradley, Rios, Maidana, Lara, Angulo, Martinez, Ortiz and now Algieri are, the promoters are very aware of this, they know hardcore fans will buy the PPVs in kneejerk fashion regardless, but they need a interesting story, new face, and rivalry that they can sell to everyone else and it doesn't matter who the opponent is, they are sold by the main attraction i.e. Manny or Floyd, our money isn't enough to keep the PPV business afloat, casuals are needed. Canelo doesn't have the fame of the other guys, or at least enough to carry his own PPV so Canelo-Lara which appealed primarily to the hardcore fans was a bust, casuals weren't interested.

    Without the WWE like backstory the casual fan has little to no interest whatsoever, and won't buy. Why because they need an emotional investment in the fight, they need to care for the competitors, they want the soap opera element to make their blood flow and peak their interest, because they want a good guy/bad guy narrative, they know nothing about skills, styles, how to judge, refereeing, all of that doesn't mean **** to them, they just need the hook to snag and pull them in with, that entertainment value that makes them care, nothing more.

    What is entertaining?..... personality.. back stories.. English speaker.. ability on the mic... good looks... knockouts...a fan friendly style,....if a fighter can provide a few of these qualities they can be highly marketable, unfortunately most fighters don't possess more than 1 or 2 of the them, so most fighters are hard to market. So when the promoters get someone who sells they shove them down our throats.
    Sometimes they misjudge what appeals to the audience, while somewhat stupid as far as the sport goes some casual fans can spot a fraud, Broner most fans were smart enough to see him for what he was, a sad attempt to duplicate Mayweather and sell him as his heir apparent, which blew up in Haymon and Showtime's faces.

    Casual fans definitely know what they don't like, which is Being Bored, what bores them?..... overly intricate boxing matches, they want to be wowed and they aren't going to get that with a trigonometry lesson in the ring, so if a fighter is too technical... no one will care.
    Why.....because they find it complicated, which causes them to lose focus, because when you have to think while being entertained it takes you out of the moment, making you lose track and become disinterested.
    Therefore promoters don't waste their money or time trying to sell the unsellable, Lara and Rigondeaux will never be stars, because they are not willing to compromise their style to please the audience.

    So the promoter makes fights to entertain the general audience, not us, because they want as many viewers as they can get, which makes them even more money.
    We can rebel against this trend by not watching the product, causing their ratings to decrease, PPV buys to evaporate and most importantly lose their money, but that is the problem because we are addicted obsessives, and watch everything that comes on, therefore we are directly contributing to the continuation of the model that we find so problematic. We can't stop watching therefore they have no reason to amend their business model.

    Promoters will continue to do what they want, how they want, because they know we will always be there for them in spite of our protestations, because we are fanatical, so we are taken for granted as being a constant, which means we don't have to be catered to, but the nonchalant casuals, they must always been entertained, if they aren't they walk out of the door, because they don't care as much as we do.
    Its not fair to us the hardcore fans, but that's how most entertainment based businesses work. Hollywood doesn't care about geeks it only cares about the masses.
    It sucks but there is really nothing we can do about it, because the hardcore fans voice is not as loud as the casuals, because as usual the tyranny of the majority wins out..
     
  3. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    What he did was awesome and I loved it.
     
  4. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    7,140
    5,026
    Oct 22, 2015
    Part of why it works is because of the people it ****es off. YOU haven't figured out that guys like Tyson need those types of boxing fans as much or more than the ones that idolize him
     
  5. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,148
    Dec 23, 2013
    Fury knew exactly what he was doing and anyone with half a brain shouldve known what he was doing. Hes a smart business man and hes positioning himself as the villain. A role Floyd played to the count of hundreds of millions of dollars.
     
  6. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
    Wilder is exactly the same when the cameras aren't rolling where fury is the complete opposite when cameras are and aren't rolling.

    He's smart getting most people to hate him, supposed to wait till you have a proven name before making a complete joke of yourself. DW was deadly accurate about tyson being 2 totally different people.

    One humble normal dude when in company of a boxer that could be a future opponent from the meathead that shows up on camera.

    His old interviews, just couple years ago was refreshing having a title challenger speak the truth till now the clowns that's promoting a fight Wilder has turned the **** down 3x so far.

    That wwe **** is so cringe worthy, how can some of you believe it. Was so funny, him trying to get DW all riled up from a fat jiggling slob of a man.

    Worse shape than Martin, which is saying way too much. Some of you were like, taking off his clothes and he'll fight anyone, anytime. I guess that means anyone anytime not named wilder, joshua, ortiz or haye.

    Just off the top of my head, 4 guys that beat the ever living jelly rolls right off wlad. His run had run out as of the **** poor jennings fight. The wlad bs was extremely boring with what looked exactly like two oaf's trying to lose many layers and 25, 30 lbs of disgusting slobs..

    I wonder how fury is going to fight another journeyman when Wilder and Haye are ready to take his belts and smack him down. What's going to make me lmao is when wlad comes to win the rematch. Still gonna be gunshy, that's a foregone conclusion but if there is any hw wlad can still beat, it's wlad.

    Wlad by decision with a kd or possibly 2
     
  7. Ol' Bub

    Ol' Bub Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,213
    758
    Feb 28, 2012
    "Hardcore boxing fans" should know that it's all a bunch of bull****.
    Wilder has his WBC mandatory Povetkin next and Fury is bound by contract to rematch Klitschko.
    Keep that WWE ****
     
  8. The Professor

    The Professor Socialist Ring Leader Staff Member

    26,102
    18,557
    Sep 29, 2008
    Yeah, I totally agree. To me, Fury's the best boxing showman since Ali - a real character who is willing to actually promote interest in the sport by doing things like jumping the ring with his suit on, ready to "square off" with Wilder.

    This kind of thing is what BUILDS rivalries, and it is good for the sport. I think Wilder is a total fraud, but if Fury helps pump him up into a viable opponent, and this creates broad interest in the sport, then I am all for it.
     
  9. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,612
    Nov 5, 2013
    Remember what happened last time that happened?

    Mosley trying to ruin May's celebration after he won vs Marquez?

    May fought him next and kicked the everloving **** out of him.

    But that being said, I like both and I want to see this fight badly.

    PPV worthy
     
  10. WarpedDesign

    WarpedDesign Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,345
    1
    Aug 31, 2010
    Yes, well said. I have been hearing a ridiculous argument that, as heavyweight champ, Fury needs to behave in a responsible way. As if he is bringing his position into disrepute. What a load of bull. Since when were boxers meant to behave like mother Theresa?

    It was a bit WWE in fairness, but it was still entertaining and look at the talk and interest it has generated. The other thing is that these so-called fake confrontations do actually bubble over into real violence - e.g. Haye and Chisora - and while we shouldn't really condone it, again, it makes things a lot more dramatic.
     
  11. schooling

    schooling Guest

    Wilder get past povetkin first bum!
     
  12. Brujo

    Brujo Member Full Member

    266
    143
    Dec 18, 2015
    You guys realize Muhammad Ali's showmanship is pretty much the entire foundation of that WWE stuff right?
     
  13. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,354
    7,933
    Sep 2, 2011
    I've got nothing against it, I was pretty hype.
     
  14. Saltzy

    Saltzy Bam-O Full Member

    2,815
    17
    Jul 23, 2004
    I found it entertaining, I also thought it was hilarious he copied what Wilder said word for effing word.

    Im also pretty sure Fury said "I will fight you in your own "backgarden" instead of backyard.

    Other than that was good hype, hopefully both can get past their next match so they can fight, will sell big time
     
  15. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,354
    7,933
    Sep 2, 2011
    Because "role models" man, if you're a public figure for any kind of entertainment you have to be a perfect human. Hate that nonsense.

    Though someone like Broner, I hated him for it or Prince Patel... As long as you don't take it too far into **** levels, I'm cool with it.