if i was a homosexual i would have ripped you a new ass hole and **** you through it while i finger my ass at the same time!!! :hey
As Pavlick uses monster combinations to finish opponents and Haye uses single punches its obviously Haye. Pavlick is a puncher but some people on this site are delusional about his power.
i dont mind corey but still that doesnt make you a fight fan or have decent enough knowledge....many people came to see corey fight in st louis. cheering his name...does that all of them afficianado:think ? no it doesnt it. also i belive that boxing has had it's biggest year of 2007 with 3 unifications and 3 superfights this is mad stuff man. and to say it's getting swept under the mat as you so brasingly claim you defintly dont know the difference between wbf and wbc bless:rasta
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl unfunny guy :good witty...witty so anyways this justifies he is a harder puncher...actaully why did you say it? i could say how well haye is as a model...:smooch
Saying a middleweight hit's harder than a guy who can knock out heavyweight's is retarted, of course Haye hit's harder.
It is tough to call. I would slightly go with Haye because many of his stoppages come from one shot. People using Pavliks stoppage of Taylor as an example of one shot power must be insane. He stunned Taylor with a single shot, which then caused Taylor to back peddle. Pavlik then landed a barrage of power punches. Pavlik clearly hits very hard, but he seems to stun guys a little and then capitalise with great aggression and precision...constant, hard, accurate punching. Haye tags guys with one shot from nowhere and the fight is over. However I think Ding hits harder than Haye. Most of Hayes KO wins have not been guys left out cold, a good few have been the ref stepping in as a guy takes a beating. Ding has put several good fighters to sleep...utterly out cold.