harder puncher lewis or tyson?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pacpowerpellet, Jan 30, 2011.


  1. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Tyson was more explosive. Once his explosiveness dissapated, post prison, I think Lennox may have hit slightly harder.

    Either way, it's an insignficant difference because both men had one punch knockout potential.
     
  2. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
  3. naldo marshal

    naldo marshal heavyweight champ Full Member

    5,823
    0
    Oct 4, 2010
    malik abdul aziz tyson!
     
  4. Colpolite

    Colpolite Guest

    Lewis 1 punch is more powerful especially the 1-2 Jab uppercut or jab straight right

    Mike Tyson is the more crispier/sharper and accurate puncher, he hurts you with fast blitzing combination that has good power
     
  5. naldo marshal

    naldo marshal heavyweight champ Full Member

    5,823
    0
    Oct 4, 2010
    it's almost been extinct to find a deadliest puncher like him, rite!
     
  6. Andy McNab

    Andy McNab Boxing Addict banned

    5,092
    1
    Sep 12, 2010
    Lewis. Tyson had power and quick hands but Lewis was extremely strong with good timing and his punches has a lot behind them. Compare the two and on the opponents they both faced.
     
  7. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    Tyson, without a doubt. Take those pounds off Lewis, and his height advantage, nullifying his weight drop advantage, and the discrepancy becomes even more apparent.

    P4P, Tyson 4 times harder. Normal, Tyson twice as hard.
     
  8. JIM KELLY

    JIM KELLY Bullshyt Mr Han Man! Full Member

    21,349
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    prime..
    Tyson was groomed to throw the powerful shots..technique wise. Very Lethal.
     
  9. herbzg

    herbzg Euro-Level Athlete Full Member

    1,826
    170
    Dec 5, 2009
    Neither.

    I have enclosed a list of heavyweights who not only have twice as much punching power, but also have better handspeed, technical skills, ring generalship, and mainstream appeal than Lewis and Tyson combined:


    Vladimir Tereshkin 13-0
    Andrzej Wawrzyk 20-0
    Mariusz Wach 23-0
    Yakup Saglam 27-0
    Andriy Rudenko 20-0
    Alexey Soloviev 17-0
    Kubrat Pulev 10-0
     
  10. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    Lewis had more one punch power, and its not even debatable
     
  11. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    Lewis's straight right hand was harder than anything Tyson could throw. Tyson just had more punches that he could hurt you with.
     
  12. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    WTF is your point? The question isn't about who was the hardest puncher in history or who had better handspeed or teqnical skill. It was who punches the hardest between 2 guys. How can the answer be neither?
     
  13. herbzg

    herbzg Euro-Level Athlete Full Member

    1,826
    170
    Dec 5, 2009
    Well, I felt the threadstarter would be more interested in the athletes on my list. I apologize if I was wrong. But if you must know, I feel Lewis had greater power. Tyson hit hard, but Lewis had many one-punch KOs against better opposition, such as when he knocked out Rahman. Tyson's power is somewhat overrated, especially considering his level of opposition compared to Lewis's opposition.
     
  14. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Tyson. Nobody threw a punch with the kind of leverage he used. Lewis was bigger and heavier handed.