Harder puncher, Mike Tyson or George Foreman?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Aug 15, 2023.


  1. fistsof steel

    fistsof steel Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,195
    3,056
    Nov 13, 2010
    What a young Foreman did to Frazier in 2 rounds was incredible...
    This content is protected
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2023
  2. CroBox29

    CroBox29 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,024
    5,682
    Nov 24, 2019
    Foreman but Tyson launched sharper and faster combinations.
     
  3. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,933
    Jun 13, 2012
    Holyfield, who fought both, said Foreman hit harder.
     
  4. fistsof steel

    fistsof steel Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,195
    3,056
    Nov 13, 2010
    And George was 42....
     
    m.s. and lahiredgun like this.
  5. slash

    slash Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,487
    2,763
    Apr 15, 2012
  6. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,866
    Apr 19, 2010
    Naturally George
    Mikes was kinetic
    Different
     
  7. reckless

    reckless Active Member Full Member

    1,141
    1,240
    Mar 18, 2018
    Even when he was hydrated he was around 226lbs like he was against Lyle. Like I said, not that big.
     
  8. reckless

    reckless Active Member Full Member

    1,141
    1,240
    Mar 18, 2018
    Because he carries a lot of fat nowadays like Holmes.
     
  9. JOKER

    JOKER Froat rike butterfry, sting rike MFER! banned Full Member

    16,514
    18,128
    Dec 18, 2019
    Inoue
    Jackson
    Tyson
    Foreman
     
  10. Guerra

    Guerra Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,390
    4,332
    May 23, 2020
    I would put Hamed in there as well p4p one of the hardest hitting boxers ever
     
  11. Guerra

    Guerra Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,390
    4,332
    May 23, 2020
    I'd be more scared of Foreman punching me though.
     
  12. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,334
    17,549
    Feb 28, 2012
    Agree, George was freakishly strong for sure with more clubbing punches, Mike was more explosive and the unseen can be devastating.
    There's a fallacy that the modern larger boxers would generate more power, Wilder possibly but he's only been tested against Fury, so until I see him against the other top guys in the division then his power is overrated to me. Mike and George fought the top guys in far deeper eras and brute force wasn't always sufficient to get the win. As you say it's complicated, we can only really guess based on level of competition and different styles fought, even then it;s far from conclusive.
     
    Brighton bomber likes this.
  13. JOKER

    JOKER Froat rike butterfry, sting rike MFER! banned Full Member

    16,514
    18,128
    Dec 18, 2019
    Nah. He only fought bums or shot guys. First threat he faced clowned him.
     
  14. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,240
    15,058
    Dec 6, 2008
    Tyson flatlines Frazier cold imo. Slow starter vs the fastest starter.
     
  15. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,174
    Dec 16, 2012
    He carried over 230 in his first career, but yes 226 he may have been fully hydrated.
    I do not know-you have a record of when he was how dehydrated?

    Certainly he was not large by modern HW standards.
    Because they consciously bulk up-& some use PEDs, I doubt Foreman ever did.

    Also you cannot merely use weight-he was leaner in his first career than many in recent times.
    Also if he was say 6'6" like Joshua, then considering how much these guys weigh in lean mass per inch, he would be lean in the mid 240's.
    Then just because the number is larger folks would think he was more bulky.

    So not large by modern standards, not a SHW-but even today he would have no less than average lean mass per inch.
    Without extraordinary weigh training or (likely) any PEDs.