harder puncher, mosley or judah?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Relentless, Mar 24, 2008.


  1. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
  2. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007
    I would say that Mosley is the heavier handed fighter, but Zab is the sharper more dynamic puncher.
     
  3. RICH

    RICH Active Member Full Member

    1,176
    0
    Jan 16, 2008
    Imma Say Mosley.
     
  4. Shaolin Box

    Shaolin Box Respect Full Member

    4,030
    3
    Nov 30, 2007
    Mosely looks like the harder puncher
     
  5. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    Zab is a 1 punch KO guy so he has more single ppunch power IMO. Mosley is the comibnation puncher and for the most part that is how he scores his KOs
     
  6. this bloke

    this bloke Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,654
    0
    Dec 6, 2007

    i agree
    zab has harder 1 punch i think but mosely is much more consistently throwing hard punches at this weight
     
  7. pasky2000

    pasky2000 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,119
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Zab's power comes from the quickness of his release but I think Mosley has definitely more natural power than Judah !
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,145
    Jun 23, 2005
    Judah is a far more explosive puncher than Shane so I'd say Judah.
     
  9. KayEpps

    KayEpps Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,693
    1
    Jul 25, 2007
    I'm sorry - but at what weight does Judah have one punch KO power?

    Who did he KO with one punch at WW?

    Shane KO'ed Vargas with one nice Left Hook and this was at 154lb. Plus Shane's level of comp., as of lately, has been better than Zab's.

    Zab has been fighting unknown guys - going the whole distance and he's been fighting inbetween 147 & 154.

    Shane is by far the harder puncher of the two. Shane's power had Cotto running the second half of that fight, while Zab couldn't keep Cotto off of him. I wonder why?
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,145
    Jun 23, 2005
    Zab hurt Cotto in that fight much more than Shane ever did. Why do you think he low blowed him?:deal
     
  11. KayEpps

    KayEpps Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,693
    1
    Jul 25, 2007
    Nice Uppercut - we all saw that.

    But it's the only punch he relied on - once Cotto shut that down - we all saw what happened.

    And Yes - it was a One Punch Uppercut that didn't stop Cotto - but hurt him. I'm guessing you're saying the Low Blows was the reason Zab lost the fight.

    If so - why didn't Zab beat Mayweather - after a Rabbit punch and a Low Blow.

    Shane's still the harder puncher of the two.
     
  12. smoochp

    smoochp Da flyest1 Full Member

    4,082
    0
    Mar 1, 2008
    I agree koing spinks doesn't do to me. I f you look a most of Shane's fights in the past they were all one punch KO's.
     
  13. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,145
    Jun 23, 2005
    No I'm not and have gone on record as saying as much. Everyone knows Zab is a frontrunner and is done after 6 rounds Cotto beats Zab low blows or not unless Zab can catch him with a big shot and finish him off.
     
  14. Sinew

    Sinew The Assassin Full Member

    5,125
    191
    Feb 7, 2005
    This.
     
  15. whit

    whit Active Member Full Member

    1,244
    0
    Sep 6, 2007
    It's hard to say but I would have to guess Zab does.