Harder puncher: Thomas Hearns, Julian Jackson, Gerald McClellan, or GGG?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Flo_Raiden, Oct 27, 2014.


  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,964
    3,447
    Jun 30, 2005
    The weigh-in rules changes in the mid 80s, after Mancini-Kim in 1982 and the canceled Spinks-EM Muhammad rematch in 1983.

    McClellan was a huge weight cutter and put on a shitload of weight overnight. Jackson and Hearns fought under both rules. It’s hard to imagine that Hearns fought at 147 during the era of the same day weigh ins.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,565
    May 4, 2017
    Jones wouldn`t have knocked out Duran and Jackson at light middle would have had a better chance at stopping Duran than G-man at middle, I think Gerald was a lot like Iran Barkley and both men were beat by Benn.
     
  3. Enigmadanks

    Enigmadanks Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,744
    975
    Feb 5, 2009
    I'd have to go with Jackson. His power was almost unnatural. To be able to knock guys out cold while moving backwards and having very little leverage or momentum behind his shots seems almost physically impossible.

    He wasn't the greatest boxer by any means, but wow did he have that one punch knock out power. There were a few fights he was in where he came from behind to knock his opposition out (came out of nowhere.) His power is right up there with the very best P4P punchers in the history of the sport.