Well, I don't really know the geezer, so it's early for me to judge from one post. But that was a strange comment.
because the underdog must take the fight into the favored fighter...before, the challenger must take the fight into the champion but that is not applicable in our era.. remember the mosley-cotto fight. cotto receives the nod in close rounds because he is favored to win that fight. i go by the philosophy that the underdog must steal the round. if it is even, the favored fighter gets close rounds...that the judging practice nowadays..see collazo-berto fight
No, that's wrong. Yous core it for the fighter who is most effective. It's idiots like you that make stupid decisions like Casamayor over Santa Cruz.
what! sta. cruz was the clear winner in that fight...casamayor did nothing to hurt sta cruz...there was NO close rounds in that fight...
i always favour the champ as a challenger has t win the title thats the worst scoring i have ever heard of im abit like taht
Ok, hope nostalgia hadn't gotten the better of me, it's been going on thirty years since I seen it!:think
Cotto definitely beat Mosely, no question about it. I thought Morales & MABs 1st fight had a lot of very tough rds to score, a lot of incredibly even rds of give & take. :good