maybe your losing it if your taht old :good ill watch t for the first time and i like both fighters so there should be no bias
I like both guys so I don't feel biased...I can't remember my exact scorecard, but did have Minter winning by 1...But I do remember at the end of about 9 different rds wondeing if I had scored it for the right guy...Maybe it will be found by you or others an easier fight to score, but i will be interested in hearing your thoughts on this one!!! So be sure to post after you watch it.
Not that I've seen the fight (or that anyone I'm aware of has, or even that video exists of it), but I have to imagine Hagler-Seales II was a tough fight to score, considering the judges didn't even know how to score it. 99-99, 99-99, 98-96. Can't say I've ever seen scores like that for any other fight, where the majority of the rounds were scored 10-10. Of fights I've actually seen, Cruz-Mashaba might have been the toughest to score, or at least provided the widest range of legitimate outcomes. Pretty much every round, Cruz outthrew and outlanded Mashaba about 2-1, but pretty much every round Mashaba landed the harder punches.
Holyfield-Valuev is really hard to score. Anyone who isn't doing something else by the end of round 6 is probably a paid judge.
i had it the same score as you it was a great fight heres my card Minter:1,3,4,5,6,9,12,13 Antuofermo: 2,7,8,10,11,14,15 Tota: 143-142 Minter what a fight :good i could see that actually as the rounds was close but i favour the boxer and i only had him 1 round up
Well there was some controversy on the scoring. Hence the immed. rematch. Very close fight though. I however thought Antuofermo won.
How can you have Calzaghe winning 9-3. I can't see more than 115-113 Calzaghe. I personally had the fight a draw. Hopkins made Calzaghe miss alot when he was slapping.