Hardest hitting Welterweight in history

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by The Wanderer, Jan 16, 2009.

  1. headhunter

    headhunter Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,592
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
  2. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,788
    774
    Jul 25, 2008

    You can't make comparisons like that, you'd end up going round in circles.
     
  3. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    45
    May 4, 2007
    I would pick Cuevas for hardest-hitting. Hearns had more one-punch K.O's, but I feel that was because he often landed cleaner due to his handspeed and superior technique.
     
  4. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007
    Hearns was the more devastating single puncher. He was very sharp and accurate aswell.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,656
    22,824
    Apr 27, 2005

    Maybe, hard to decipher.
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,656
    22,824
    Apr 27, 2005
    Joe Louis said SRR was the hardest 147 hitter he ever saw till Hearns come along.
     
  7. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    25
    Mar 10, 2007
    based on record ithas to be robinson but its hard to gauge who was the hardest and most powerful
     
  8. META5

    META5 Active Member Full Member

    839
    707
    Jun 28, 2005
    Hearns hit harder than SRR (just about IMO) and had better handspeed, but he didn't have SRR's experience, stamina, durability, ring generalship and a whole number of intangiables, IMO.

    One thing that people rarely consider about SRR is that after the death of Doyle, it's likely that SRR actually held back a bit of his natural power in the ring, not to the extent that Charles did with Baroudi, but somewhat.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  9. Rebel-INS

    Rebel-INS Mighty Healthy Full Member

    2,490
    4
    Apr 12, 2008
    I understand what your saying, but if everyone agrees that the same three or four fighters are the hardest hitters, why would they name anyone else?
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,656
    22,824
    Apr 27, 2005
    Agreed all round. We both say Hearns hit harder and i agree SRR backed off a little post Doyle.
     
  11. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,788
    774
    Jul 25, 2008
    All this just goes to show what a fighter Hearns was when you consider that he was almost unboxeable. Wonder if I've just invented a new word.
     
    Tonto62 likes this.
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,656
    22,824
    Apr 27, 2005
    Maybe, but i'd take the "e" out :smoke
     
    AlFrancis likes this.
  13. CottoDaBodykill

    CottoDaBodykill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,735
    13
    Apr 6, 2008
    if jake lamotta let hearns hit him as much as he let robinson hit him he woulda been worst off then ali!
     
  14. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    2
    May 30, 2007
    when i did this thread last year in gf,it was unanimous for hearns.

    my picks:
    1.hearns
    2.cuevas
    3.trinidad
     
  15. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    52
    Aug 26, 2004
    Strictly looking at the second-tier fighters that lacked the talent and efficiency to be compared outright to the likes of Hearns and Tito, i think Jones and Jose Luis Lopez were the best pure hitters, at least from the past 30 to 40 years.