Harold Lederman, Blind, biased or on the take?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Farmboxer, Feb 10, 2008.


Page 4 of 4
  1. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    360
    Aug 4, 2007
    The thing is that I think Lederman was pretty good until recently but he's had some HORRIBLE scorecards that were completely off from logic IMO. And his latest one is another example of that.
     
    klion22, Feb 11, 2008
    klion22, Feb 11, 2008
    #46
  2. LockDog387

    LockDog387 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,629
    0
    Mar 23, 2007
    He probably did bet on Williams.
     
    LockDog387, Feb 11, 2008
    LockDog387, Feb 11, 2008
    #47
  3. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    he wasnt That far off.

    Many of the rounds Carlos won were by wide margins, many of the rounds PW won were very close. So while looking at the fight as a whole it seems clear Carlos won, but judging round by round is a different story.
     
    Ramshall1, Feb 11, 2008
    Ramshall1, Feb 11, 2008
    #48
  4. BeReal

    BeReal Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,533
    0
    Apr 20, 2006
    Honestly, I look to Lederman as a gauge as to who is going to win, he is the insight behind how the HBO hype machine sees a fight, he had the fight for Williams so when the scorecards were read, I thought Williams was getting a gift, but alas, Quintana was given the nod in a fight he clearly won. Very refreshing to see.
     
    BeReal, Feb 11, 2008
    BeReal, Feb 11, 2008
    #49
Page 4 of 4