Harold Lederman says Pac should fight Kell Brook

Exactly.

Merchant was always so drunk, the next day he couldn't remember what he said the night before.

" Let me tell you Jim. X'er boxed beautifully in this round. His jabs landed at will, crisply, and the way he followed it up with the left hook was a work of art. His accuracy is amazing landing at 60%, but I gotta tell you, that over hand right Yzer threw at the end of the round round won him the round, even though it was the only punch he landed".
atsch

It's painful watching Foreman, Jones, Hopkins, Flores or Jacobs and the faces they make when they have to listen to this ignorance three dozen times per fight.

Where do they find these parachute hacks?
Fans should demand they all be fired and exiled to Florida.

 

Merchant:
"Floyd, if I hadn't drunk a quart of Gin, and if I weren't a almost blind, non-athletic guy who has never boxed or fought, and if I weren't 60 years old, then I would whip your punk azz ****** butt"!

 

Exactly what incentive does Pac have in fighting Brook, versus Bradley?

 

From Pac's perspective, that doesn't sound like a lot of incentive.

I think the Bradley decision had a lot to do with this is Pac's last fight with TR. Easy and predictable work.

 

Your Daddy got you a job too right.

 

Had Lederman made the comment as a fan and not as a commentator under contract to a specific network, it would be totally different.

Lederman is lucky as hell to have the cushy parachute job he has that he performs less efficiently than even a mouthy low level boxer, so he should at least be professional and STFU about promotional and match-making decision.

Other people get paid for doing that, and generally perform their more complex duties more effectively than Harold performs his very simple shoe-in task. :deal