Who from them is most legitimate as a opponent here: Haye taking WBA defense vs former Ollimpic Gold medalist & current European champion, a true draw at the UK market .... Wlad taking defense of Ring, WBO, IBF belts vs undefeated, dangerous British champion ... Adamek stay busy fight before guaranteed title shot vs latest conqueror of Mike Tyson, the pride of Scotland or whatever is located nearby ... Take a look into the circumstances. ?
chisora, mcbride got by on size, audrey got by on a safety first amateur style who was heart scared of engaging in the pro ranks
Out of Harrison, Chisora, McBride, and Solis - Chisora. And Chisora really isn't very good, which says a lot about the rest.
i think Solis being as fat as he is still has some good skills and would beat both chisora and harrison.
I actually think Solis is better than Chisora. But that is besides the point of this thread I am guessing. We are talking about voluntary fights, not mandatories. Audley has been horribly exposed, and that has been the situation for many years. McBride was never that good, and is many years past his best anyway. I guess that means Chisora is the pick of the bunch. Not because he has proven that he is any good, but he hasn't proven that he sucks yet, either.
Chisora. Undefeated, pre (not past) prime, has the British titles. Coming off decent win against Sexton. Neither Chisora nor Harrison did enough for a title shot but this sport is a money game after all. McBride has lost 4 of his last 5 so he doesn't rate. Solis is a class above all 3. But if he was matched against Chisora I might like Chisora if Solis is 260+.