Harry Greb officially ducks Les Darcy

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Boilermaker, May 12, 2016.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,243
    Feb 15, 2006
    Why would Greb duck anybody?

    He obviously wasn’t particularly afraid of losing.

    Neither did he have any sort of title to lose for much of his career.

    The only thing that ever seems to have steered Greb away from a fight, is the idea that the damage that he might have taken, would have compromised his next three fights (which would obviously have been fairly close together)!
     
  2. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004

    I am not ignoring this at all.

    Les Darcy answers Grebs hollow challenges. He is so vocal his news travels across the entire country and even world as evidenced by the story 10000 miles away in Australia. Greb Responds with terms that say if he lasts the distance he gets the money. And he doesnt muck around with that message. He sends it across the entire town of Buffalo New York. :lol:
     
  3. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    He didnt. I thought it was common ground that Darcy was a demi-god, not a man. A Bit like Dempsey. Actually, maybe Dempseys statement was self serving. Those demi gods need to stick together you know.

    Well he refused to allow a decision in 90 % of his fights, so he was either afraid to Lose or he didnt like winning. Which do you think it is?

    Settle down that is a bit nasty. He legitimately was one of the all time greats.

    Fair enough too. Greb was a smart man. He wasnt scared to fight Darcy. He just didnt want to miss out on his next 3 paydays while he recovered in the hospital.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,737
    29,088
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm seeing you in a new light B .

    And I am enjoying it.:good
     
  5. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    They didnt fight because Darcy didnt want it before the window closed with his death.

    In jan/feb 1917 Darcy turned down $15,000 to fight Gibbons. In Feb of 1917 Greb, from his sick bed, took short money on short notice just to be able to climb into the ring with Gibbons. At the same time Darcy refused to fight Jeff Smith saying the same thing as he did with Greb "ill fight him in private". Less than two months later Greb fought Smith and dominated him. He didnt need his managers brother to give him a gift dq to do it either. Dont pretend you know this stuff better than me. You dont.
     
  6. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    This just just illustrates how little you understand the context here. Those hollow challenges were issued by Greb while Darcy was in Grebs hometown, Pittsburgh. Not only did Darcy refuse but he wouldnt even participate in an exhibition with Greb. His next tour stop was Buffalo where Greb continued to follow him and where Darcy made his statement. Thats why its important because Buffalo was the primary source. Not ****ing new zealand of all places. I swear its pointless arguing with nobodies on the internet because the vast majority barely possess the opposible digits necessary to operate their keyboard much less the intelligence necessary to understand the subject matter.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,737
    29,088
    Jun 2, 2006
    You're just jealous because he has seen Hague v Langford and he has "historian friends", who have film of Greb in action. If you were smart you would lick his n*ts and join the inner circle. :good
     
  8. Chuck1052

    Chuck1052 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,979
    627
    Sep 22, 2013
    Was there a promoter who was willing to offer Darcy a purse of at least $15,000. to fight Harry Greb during the early part of 1917? I doubt it because Greb was not a big-name fighter at the time. Darcy was turning down offers of $15,000. or more to fight during the first three months of 1917. Yes, Darcy eventually agreed to fight a journeyman named Len Rowlands during April or May, probably for a purse of far less than $15,000. It appears that Darcy was quite desperate to get a fight under his belt in the United States by that time, but may have not been willing to face a fighter as formidable as Greb for such a purse. Meanwhile, Greb was known to go out of his way to fight the best throughout his great career.

    - Chuck Johnston