Boxing like many other sports often looks back to a golden age when men where men, tough men. Some how it implies that over the last 50-100 years humans have become soft, this retoric is maintained by every generation to the next, when we are in our 60's we will no doubt be the same. However in the cold light of day if you actually look at a lot of old fighters they where crap, fighting often clueless opponents. Also it has to be pointed out that black fighters where not allowed to fight them. However the fighters where game - but that does not make them any good. One man that is certain to get a top 3 mention on this site at middle weight is Harry Greb. But take a look at the links below then ask yourself - how would this guy do against the likes of Hagler, Hearns, Monzon, Hopkins or even Benn, Eubank. The guy would be destroyed. I know people will say oh but he had 260 fights etc but his opponents where clueless by today's standards. Look at him then take a look at Roy Jones, there is no comparison. Have a look at the links with an open mind - can you imagine him lasting 1 round with Hearns or how would he have managed against Mike McCallum? Only respond when you have seen the footage. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO2dTnFl2Z0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMA6Pd6tT3Q http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBqV_7Vm2IY
You can't accuratly judge a fighter based on training videos. All you have to do is look at his record and read what people who actually saw him fight had to say to know how great he was.
It springs from a factual well though, guys fighting 40 rounds, guys fighting three top opponents in a month (compare that to now where some "champions" won't do that in a life time!) Of course, no-one is convincing me that Greb was "tougher" than Hopkins, that's BS, BUT old school boxing rewarded tougher fighters. If you had really bad hands, for example, it would be around 100 times harder to carve out a successful career because of fight schedules and less readily available medical care. You had to be tougher then than a similair fighter would now. I wonder how many world class talents were lost because guys just didn't have the toughness to carry on? Western capatalists societys tend to become more affluent, not less. It is an absolute fact that each generations will enjoy more luxuries than the last, and that opulance tends to make people "softer". It's a generality and I agree for the most part that it has nothing at all to do with boxing. Why are the black fighers not included in "them"? You seem to be saying here that black fighters are less crap than white fighters when discussing a bygone era which is nonsensical. You have posted footage of Harry Greb goofing of for the camera. I have footage of Ali sparring a giant stuffed gorilla. Shall we judge Ali based upon that? Do you think this is how Greb really fought? Really? Why don't you post some footage of Tunney, a master-boxer by absolutley any sensible standard. A bigger man, Greb found a way to beat him despite his wonderful skills. He looks silly. I can't imagine him lasting a round with Tunney or Lougran either. You can judge the greatest resme in the history of boxing based on goofy sparring footage, or the resume plus the film we have of the men he beat.
I raised the point about these guys not fighting black fighters for a number of reasons. Firstly it shows in my opinion how disorganised boxing was, as was true of all sports, but by being so there was no where near the amount of quality matches set up. But lets be honest the few black fighters able to compete back then wiped the floor with their opponents 99 times out of a hundred. Boxing was not allowed to continue like this imagine if throughout history only a handful of black fighters could have competed. Boxing would still have had its greats but in reality they would have been pretenders. People go on about his resume but it is worthless if he is fighting bums - which he was. You can not compare Ali and Greb, I am no Ali fan but when he fought their where no barriers and the sport was organised Ali would probably not have been allowed to fight in the 20's or moreover if he had the top white fighters would have avoided him. Yet those fighters would have been considered great and Ali would have been a what if fighter.
Off the top of my head - Maxie Rosenbloom - ATG LHW, pure boxings master. Mickey Walker - ATG WW, MW Gene Tunney - ATG LHW (#1 candidate), appears on some ATG HW lists Tiger Flowers - ATG MW Tommy Gibbons - ATG LHW Tommy Loughran - ATG LHW Kid Norfolk - ATG LHW These are just the ones I can think of, becaus i'm not going to do what you clearly can't be bothered to do, log on to boxrec and check out his wins. And if you don't recognise those names that isn't my fault - take my word for it maybe. Greb arguably has more greats on his win resume than anyone else who ever fough. Top 40 Middleweight? Top 4 all time p4p is a better question. Black fighters were indeed treated like ****, as late as the 40's, possibly beyond. If Ali had fought in the 20's he would be regarded as one of the best of all time, just as he is now, just as Wills is now, just as Langford is now, just as Kid Norfolk is now, just as...i think you're getting the point. Greb fought mostly white fighters, same as most white fighters of his era. He also fought ATG black fighters.
Harry Greb is not a top 40 middleweight he is a top 1 middleweight. No other middleweight in history can match his resume or even aproach it. These are the facts of the matter. In fact you would be hard put to find two middleweights whose combined resume matches up to his. It is just about possible if one of them is Mickey Walker who Greb beat incidentaly.
You are missing the point there where very few black fighters, most of them are now considered all time greats - what does that tell you? You can't see many of his or his contemporary's so how can you judge him or them? Are you telling me that Greb could have stood a chance against Hagler, Hearns or Roy Jones etc. Wake up man!
Take a look at some footage of Gene Tunney and ask yourself whether any of the fighters you just listed would have a chance against him. The obvious colclusion is that they wouldnt.
There were hundreds of black fighters. Greb fought many of the best of them. Where are you going with this? But you can see some of them. Is it ok if I judge them? He is even money at worst against these guys, and I would certainly pick him to beat Hagler and Jones. Hearns is interesting, I pick Greb. Tiger would beat Greb IMO, Hopkins would have a shot. I make these picks based on what I do know, which as you've pointed out, isn't much. But it seems to be more than you. Greb beat more ATG fighters than all the guys you list combined.
There is footage of Gene Tunney, Tommy Loughran, Tommy Gibbons, Mike Gibbons, Jimmy Slaterey, Mickey Walker. These guys are as good as anybody their weight today or better.
Now, I'm all for ranking Greb very high.... But this video had me in absolute tears. [YT]0xm8Y-pWzIg[/YT] :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Fair enough gov. Those are two great fighters. But Greb is the ultimat pressure fighter and Jones has looked a litte susceptable. Of course, Greb might not have the pure power needed to keep Jones honest. You pick Hagler to just out-box Greb, what?