Harry Greb v Fred Fulton Prime For Prime

Fulton used it well on an aging Langford, but a prime Greb was a different animal. He was non stop, he would be all over Fulton. Fulton had a glass body and wasn’t tough. I think Greb would take some punishment but a good left jab isn’t enough to stop Greb who was like a human windmill and he took great angles with his feet. I believe Greb systematically wears Fulton down and stops him late. Greb would score on the inside with big flurries and then bounce out of range. He’d keep throwing angles at Fulton and Fred wouldn’t be able to react fast enough to keep Harry from getting inside

 

I didn’t say it, Dempsey did! Dempsey’s words were “Langford was too good at that stage in my career”

I think Langford was still pretty good but on the Decline. Dempsey himself thought he had enough left in the tank to beat him

Prime Greb beats 1917 Langford in my opinion

 

Yes, he was over the hill but dangerous. Exactly. Not as good as a prime harry Greb but neither were any of Dempsey’s victims. Harry Greb would have been Dempsey’s best win.

A 1917 Langford would rank in Dempsey’s top 5 wins

 

There is no contradiction

1. Langford was past his prime in 1917 but still dangerous

2. He would have been a big win for Dempsey in 1917

3. Fulton being able to jab a 1917 Langford’s face off doesn’t mean he would be able to do it against harry Greb

4. Harry Greb in his prime is much better than a 1917 Langford

5. Dempsey did say Langford was too good for him in 1917

 

Styles...

Langford gave up a foot in height to Fulton who boxed from the outside using his long reach

Dempsey would charge right into langfords strengths and go toe to toe

 

I think Fulton beats Willard for sure

 

Yeah Greb is absolutely incredible maybe the best ever. I wouldn’t argue against him

I think Fulton was a decent fighter, it’s an impressive win by Dempsey for sure