many people think Greb is the greatest of all time but how would he fair against one of the most boring fighters of all time
Nobody can't accurately judge how he fought, but going on descriptions, greb would probably have to high of a workrate for Bernard to get comfortable and would be hit with to many shots to effectively counter and score enough to win rounds.
Who the hell picked Greb by KO? The man rarely KO'd people. Greb was the wrong style for Hopkins, very high volume and very unstoppable. Clear UD for the Pittsburg Windmill. A style between Pacquiao and Calzaghe with a harder chin than either. Routinely beat up LHW's and HW's, crossed the color barrier on many occasions to test himself. There was once footage, but all known fight footage was lost after WWII either due to deterioration or recycling to the war effort. What we do have are multiple simultaneous accounts of his fights from reporters that span over his career that support one another, accounts from many of his famous opponents that attest to his amazing abilities, and footage of many of his top opponents in other fights. You can choose to accept this or doubt it, but based on accounts that's what you have. Many more believe in much more based on far less, but religion doesn't belong here...
Anyone who voted Greb by KO is an absolute moron, Bhop never been stopped in his entire career and a great chin vs a guy who is one of the most feather fisted fighters of all time. Talk about old time favoritism, reality is we have no idea, you can't just go on records i mean nobody here has seen Greb ever fight so how can you say he beats Bhop.
Instead of calling yourself bballchump11 you should change your username to netballcunt11. Which is a far more apt username for a Broner fan. :gayfight