Harry Greb vs Bob Satterfield with modern gloves

ah, yes "many alts", Satterfield cos the way he came at you from the opening bell could have caused Greb problems. That is my point. Brennan was called ko cos he scored a bunch of ko's, none of which amounted to anything. Now as you are a great pysstorian should know, Brennan was horrible, and it just goes to prove that Dempsey when he fought Brennan that last time was not at his best. I could see why Greb beat him he was terrible. He was lucky to come up at that time cos he would not have even made it into the top 100 at any other time. Also goes to prove that you know nothing about boxing, a guy that can hit as hard as an ATG hitter, can land and since Greb was punchless and a MW and Satterfield knew this how would have Greb fought him in the 1st couple of rds?. Jeez are you not as smart as you claim to be. Satterfield is in everybody's ATG hitters list, Brennan I don't see, I wonder why? Also Brennan fought nothing like Satterfield forget about the power.

 

Too bad you wont, I wonder why his fights weren't taped or if they were how come they aren't cos Greb fought everybody. The same with many great fights and fighters who went unrecorded. All we have are countless descriptions that gives an idea, not the whole picture.

 

Haha beautiful, video tape hadn't been invented yet, now that is priceless. You always go for the yes replies. Duh, really but how did they post it on youtube? hahaha

Psst a hint they filmed fights since the late 1800's. I guess you musta forgot.
About conspiracy theory's aren't you the one who came with bald muscular black men and the Archer conspiracy. Somebody said you were a salesman, do you do part time stand up comedy also? Stop reaching for yes that's right replies, nobody but nobody has said anything but that Greb was a great fighter. So why do you bring it up time after time, you bring it up cos you really want to think you have a point, you do but nobody is disputing that Greb was great. You bring up great smoking guns, "duh, why do you think they call Brennan "Ko"?
Please we are talking fights and fighters, since you know nothing about fighters, remember this styles make fights. I am talking about a fighter and his style. So stop nitpicking, cos you are like Greb throwing arm punches. Greb, was a 165pd guy, who bounced around like a jumping bean and throwing featherdusting punches. Then you are looking at a 180pd monster who comes at you throwing monster punches, he even had Charles on the run, til he got knocked out, greb didn't have that option. In my opinion if Greb would have gone the rds he might have worn out Satterfield. But the early rds were a danger.

 

You are one funny dude, I also said he was the John Ruiz of his time, I guess you must have missed that. Like you people change their minds as they find out more. What does it say about Dempsey? That he was human. Dempsey knocked him out twice, the first he was in shape, the second everybody questioned his performance but I guess you missed that. But even then a sub par Dempsey knocked Brennan out again. Nobody thought Brennan would improve if he fought him again so that in itself should tell you something.
About the chinny LHW, I did mention 180pds ck back.

 

Dumb and dumber, cr appon and RV, haha. Please what excuses? I gotta tell you I am honored that feel you have to attack me with different alts. Give it up brother you have drowned while reaching for straws.

 

lest I forget you never answered that question I asked about the Dempsey contract you posted or the the Pitts fight, especially the part where you said Kearns was "stalling", stop embarrassing yourself with your lack of knowledge with simple contracts and negotiating tactics.

 

Haha they're coming to take you away haha, they're coming to take you away haha. Is this another feeble attempt to duck out of the legitimate questions I asked hmmm
Methinks it is.

 

first who am I talking to "many alts", I gave my opinion you countered with your opinion, and again we went back and forth, I didn't "duck" questions/opinion like you do. Do you have a ***ual problem? You always comeback, with nuthuggers, bald muscular blackmen and now calling me peaches, makes me wonder.
Whatever you say if directed at me I will answer, so far I ve done that. If you think I might have missed one of your fabulous opinion please tell which it is and I will answer you. Answer mine if you would be so I kind.