Harry Greb vs Sam Langford

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flea Man, Oct 5, 2009.


  1. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    I can't imagine how many times this thread has been done.

    Which incarnations of both men would make for a competitive matchup? if the 'best' versions of both men at Light-Heavy (I assume Greb would be conceding a fair few lbs) who would win?

    Would Greb be able to dart in and out without being caught with a Langford haymaker? Would Langford be able to time Greb? Or would Greb he hopelessly outgunned against a giant killer even more proficient than he?

    Maybe there are different versions of both men that mean you see different outcomes?

    For me, I think Langford takes it. Until recently I discounted the 'old time' fighters ('Bah! We've advanced so much since then' 'they wouldn't have a clue what's going on!' LOL) but having immersed myself into the footage a bit more lately (i.e appreciating the innovation and of course toughness and the possible awkwardness a modern figher may experience fighting a pre-Louis fighter) I've started to become more receptive to 'rating' older fighters.

    Langford DOES look pretty 'modern' on film. There can be no doubt about his chin and he wings his shots in like a smaller stature Foreman (with more speed and therefore more snap but less thunderous heaviness IMO) and given the people he stopped and the weights in which he ascended to there can be little argument that he hit very hard, be it for his time or, even today (older fighters thin gloves might hurt 'Modern' fighters, although todays fighters' padded gloves allow them to sit down on their punches more and they of course have th ability to study footage and modern science/training)

    Now, these are two of the P4P greats, there can be no doubt, both of their resumes speak for themselves.

    I'm still pretty much in the dark about both men (have both the Greb and Langford books on the way so looking forward to delve into both futher) so don't even mind if I get flamed :D

    Who takes it over 15. And what weight would either man show up in? Would light-Heavy Langford (and which performance from Langford would you choose, even if it's one where he gave up poundage to a Heavy) just be too much for Greb?

    Which opponent of Greb's would you say would be a good gauge as to what his performance may be like in the Langford fight?

    I may be waffling, I'll leave it up to the more knowledgable posters, even I just get diverted to an old thread that has described this in detail:good:good
     
  2. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    107
    Oct 9, 2008
    I gotta go with Sammy to beat Harry at a catch-weight............. I gotta' look back at the books, but I'm not sure S.L. could make 160 pounds without cutting off a leg.......

    From what I've read, Harold Greb was a windmill winger of wild punches in punches, but generally effective........ Inspite of Greb's big biceps, he was not a serious puncher.... Greb was a winger / banger.......

    I gotta assume Sammy was more technical and slightly bigger than Harry boy........ Sammy smacks him around for the win..............

    MR.BILL

    P.S.

    At 175, Greb's ass gets kicked fo sho............. Greb was not the same above 168 pounds..........
     
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    That's what I'm saying. Greb would nondoubt give away lbs but was known for fighting bigger guys, the question is would Langford be a step too far?
     
  4. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    107
    Oct 9, 2008
    Yes...... Lang would be that step too far for Grebbermeister.......:deal

    MR.BILL
     
  5. Big N Bad

    Big N Bad Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,990
    12
    Nov 29, 2007
    good post:good

    From watching langford vs bill lang, i can see langford has some good moves. he slips the jab and lands crushing body shots, has good a solid jab, blocks well with an open palm. he stalks his opponents down just like big george did.
    alot of people have compared langford to george foreman and i totally agree, the way he stalks his opponents down, blocking and slipping their shots and getting closer. then he starts throwing his powerful punches foreman like.
    i also like how you have described his power - more speed and snap than foreman but not the same heavieness. spot on. only i think because of his explosiveness they may have caused an even more devastating effect on his opponents. ever wondered why he has the 2nd highest ko's in history? foreman is one of the heaviest hitters ever, sometimes i just watch his fights just to hear them thudding punches land -BOOM BOOM

    skill wise harry greb may trouble langford. I question how would greb handle langfords (tua like) power?
    langford was knocking heavyweights spark out who ither never been knocked out or rarely. harry wills and joe jeannette who was only stopped twice in 165 fights!!
     
  6. JudgeDredd

    JudgeDredd Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,949
    33
    Sep 14, 2009
    As much as I hate to say it, from what I know of Langford, he'd be a bit too much for Greb
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,555
    Nov 24, 2005
    Greb and Langford were about the same weight - 165 pounds in their best condition.

    Langford would beat Greb, IMO.
     
  8. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    284
    Apr 18, 2007
    Nobody was ever able to take Harry out once he hit his stride. Over the distance, it would be a matter of quality versus quantity. Sam took out Wills twice when Harry was moving in for the kill. Greb would never attempt to do this, but aim for a decision win all the way. Many of Langford's opponents were afraid of him, but Ketchel apparently wasn't, and fought him to a standstill. Harry wouldn't have been scared of him either. I don't see Sam prevailing over 15 rounds against the kind of volume Greb would snow on him.

    Greb UD 15 Langford
     
  9. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    88
    Dec 26, 2007
    I agree. I don't see where people get off thinking Langford was a bad matchup for Greb rather than vice-versa. Probably just going by the "puncher>swarmer" method of thinking.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    I'm going to quit watching boxing and just make predictions from reading newspaper clippings, obviously you can make judgements with far more certainty
     
  11. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    88
    Dec 26, 2007
    That's not true at all, but it's pretty much on par with everything else you post, so I couldn't have expected much different.:good
     
  12. KTFO

    KTFO Guest

    Greb by comfortable UD
     
  13. BENNY BLANCO

    BENNY BLANCO R.I.P. Brooklyn1550 Full Member

    10,718
    9
    Mar 8, 2008
    :lol: So damn true. This reminds me of a hilarious debate Sweet Pea had with DanePuglist on another forum in regards to Harry Greb.
     
  14. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,640
    2,109
    Aug 26, 2004
    It depends on what stage of there careers, they fought...Greb handled Tunney and some other strong Light Heavys....Langford was rugged and hit hard but I see this being a close fight for the most part
     
  15. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    107
    Oct 9, 2008
    WTF?:patsch

    MR.BILL