Harry Greb-Walker film 1978?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by bman100, Mar 28, 2011.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,835
    45,550
    Mar 21, 2007
    Mendoza, read the first sentence after the first comma:

    I have seen Langford v Lang.


    i HAVE seen Langford v Lang.


    He is saying he HASN'T seen Langford v Hague, but he HAS seen Langford v Lang.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,887
    Jun 2, 2006
    Nowhere does that say I haven't seen Langford v Lang?
    Get someone to explain it to you for f*ck's sake.:patsch OMG
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,887
    Jun 2, 2006
    And you f*cking banned me!:lol:
     
  4. downgoeslyle

    downgoeslyle Member Full Member

    174
    37
    Dec 28, 2014
    I haven't been on this forum long but you do get to realise that every forum has a 'mendoza' jeez
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,330
    Jun 29, 2007
    The guy changes his story often so its hard to keep up. Ok, he has seen it ( if you trust his word ) . He wonders about Langford gloves/ They are very large. If he saw the film, he would know. It sticks out.

    Yet Lang and Hauge have different builds, and he mixed them up. I'll settle for that.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,330
    Jun 29, 2007
    Gotta love the low post count types. Dup alert...
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,887
    Jun 2, 2006
    SEE FOLLOWING POSTS.

    I typed that in caps for those of you who have problems with reading comprehension .:patsch:-(
     
  8. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,330
    Jun 29, 2007
    Because you deserved it.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,835
    45,550
    Mar 21, 2007
    And you'll get f*cking banned again if you don't calm down. There is a moderator on here that will ban you just for writing "f*cking". Just calm down, this is no good with you two.


    What you mean is, "i was embarrassingly wrong, sorry mcvey." But that's impossible for you so at the very least have the dignity to walk away from the argument.



    Whenever I ban one of you for a couple of days, I ban the other one for a couple of days. So just think about that and walk away from your more heated arguments. It's no good "winning" or "remaining calmer" when it reaches a certain point with you two, people don't want to read that stuff.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,887
    Jun 2, 2006
    No I haven't seen Langford v HAUGE! :-(

    Or Langford and HAGUE!:-(



    I've seen Langford v LANG :good


    Shall I type reta*d over and over now?:patsch

    What a c*nt you've just made of yourself.:lol:
     
  11. downgoeslyle

    downgoeslyle Member Full Member

    174
    37
    Dec 28, 2014
    A bit like your sperm count I would imagine.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,887
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm calm, except I'm laughing my socks off.
    You have often typed f*cking on here and used it directly to posters including Choklab ,and whilst you have been a mod.


    I can quote at least one instance when you said F*CK HIM.
    No one has to read anything I post they can put me on ignore.
    As for banning me again, do what you like, you'll soon have a forum comprised of Uncletermite ,Mendoza and Rhas Al Ghul.

    I wish you good luck with it.:good
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,835
    45,550
    Mar 21, 2007
    I say **** loads. But I can't get banned by another mod.

    This is ADVICE. I'm not admonishing you.

    And no, we won't soon have a forum composed of those three, because no regular poster has ever been permanently banned by me from this forum, I moderate this forum for the most part, and because the traffic is basically unchanged for about 10 years. That's crazy talk.

    I will do what I like, but what I like is to use a ban as a very final measure for a poster who has lost the plot.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,887
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've had two longtime regular posters pm me and ask if I know which mod was responsible for their posts being removed and why?
    I told them I've no idea , I don't look to see who is a mod and couldn't care less. There are some not happy with recent trends of censureship . I'm indifferent. People leaving may not be banned, they might just think ,there are so many tw&ts on here now its not worth the candle. I think I contribute quite a bit in posts and if my typing f*ck upsets anyone I suggest they put me on ignore. Ive had pms from Rhas Al ghul making comments about my dead Mother, and mongoloid children and other choice remarks but I don't come to you crying about it. We don't need a Nanny,well at least I don't.

    In a very good humour, I made a throw away remark just now as a wry comment and you saw fit to pin your Sheriff's badge on and admonish me. :patsch
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,835
    45,550
    Mar 21, 2007
    Ok, that's fair: in future i won't "admonish", or provide warnings for you. I tend to like doing it because it helps to avoid censure, but for posters who find them objectionable or don't care if they are banned, I agree they are not suitable.