Harry Wills fought 43 fights from 1919 to 1925 who really had a chance

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dempsey1234, Jun 9, 2016.


  1. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    43 fights during 1919-1925 fought nobody that had even a slight chance of beating him. The McVea fight, the firpo fight blew whatever chance he had. Then "Honest" Harry Wills, went on his traveling road show, and defrauded honest boxing fan's all over the country in glorified pitty pat exhibitions, billed as fights, and getting tossed. :lol::lol: Please your hero has many, many holes in his resume.
     
  2. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    43 fights during 1919-1925 fought nobody that had even a slight chance of beating him. The McVea fight, the firpo fight blew whatever chance he had. Then "Honest" Harry Wills, went on his traveling road show, and defrauded honest boxing fan's all over the country in glorified pitty pat exhibitions, billed as fights, and getting tossed. :lol::lol: Please your hero has many, many holes in his resume.
     
  3. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    43 fights during 1919-1925 fought nobody that had even a slight chance of beating him. The McVea fight, the firpo fight blew whatever chance he had. Then "Honest" Harry Wills, went on his traveling road show, and defrauded honest boxing fan's all over the country in glorified pitty pat exhibitions, billed as fights, and getting tossed. :lol::lol: Please your hero has many, many holes in his resume.
     
  4. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,970
    2,413
    Jul 11, 2005
    The fight might have been fought under straight Queensberry rules, not the "break clean" rules.
    But, if you really want to go that route. Here's what Sid Sutherland of Chicago Tribune wrote after Dempsey-Firpo bout:

     
  5. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Ok, but you must remember, this is what he saw, the rest of the people saw an exciting fight nitpicking later does not diminish that it was a fight for the ages. Why not admire what Dempsey did, watch those short digs to Firpo's body that dropped Firpo, who to my knowledge had never been down, there is also a hellacious right to the body as Firpo is coming in.

    If you ever imagined what Dempsey was like in a pickup barroom fight here is as close as you ever going to see.

    Besides this wasn't a boxing match it was a fight. A rare opportunity to see two guys meeting head on. The closest we come to that is the Hagler- Hearns fight.

    Enjoy stop nitpicking. I could nitpick by mentioning the tape shows one punch not three but I wont, uh I just did, see it's meaningless.

    I see he avoided saying that it was a push that sent him through the ropes.

    You know its a real shame that we come on here and tear apart two fine human beings both Wills and Dempsey were decent people, not on here people with a hatred for Dempsey attack anybody that has a positive view of him. Like myself, I never til now had a ill word to say about Wills, now, in defense of Dempsey I have to breakdown Wills.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,519
    21,902
    Sep 15, 2009
    Of course he didn't. That would include Wills and Greb, they would both be huge underdogs despite our clamour to have seen the fights made.

    Of course he wasn't scared. But of course the risk/reward ratio wasn't high enough for him.
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    It's thrown up an interesting question, What were the rules for Firpo-Wills fight ?
    I would think it highly unlikely that the fight would have been under the straight unamended Queensberry rules in New York in 1924, since the commission had their own rules.
    Especially in light of the fact that Dempsey-Firpo raised such questions that you show.(although Sutherland overstates the case against Dempsey, and omits certain details that might damaged Firpo)

    It's strange if no writer mentioned Wills hitting Firpo on the break illegally, since the film seems to show it very clearly.
    And the punch produced the only KD of the fight.

    In fact, EVEN IF by some special arrangment the straight Queensberry were in place for this fight making the blow LEGAL, I would still have expected it to be mentioned since hitting-on-the-break had long been controversial and the fact that it produced a knockdown. If the rule had been waivered for the fight, it is perhaps even more of a talking point.

    I do wonder whether the writers even saw the punch if they didn't mention the action of hitting on the break.
     
  8. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011

    If I took your argument seriously, I would drop probably drop Dempsey about 15 places in the all-time ratings.

    "nobody that had even a slight chance of beating him."

    Well, Firpo knocked Dempsey down and later out of the ring, and KO'd both Willard and Brennan. Fulton had a huge run of victories and a draw with Miske. Norfolk beat Miske twice while Dempsey had a draw against Miske at the same time. Carpentier was KO'd by Siki who in turn lost to Norfolk. Gunboat Smith lost to Weinert years before fighting Dempsey.

    If the guys who lost to Wills weren't worth a damn, the guys who were losing to Dempsey were worth even less than that damn.

    And guys like John Lester Johnson and Willie Meehan whom Wills defeated easily did better against Dempsey.

    You have really done a great job of tearing down Dempsey in your rather blind effort to tear down Wills.

    It never seemed to occur to you that avoiding a contender who is a dangerous opponent is actually less damning than avoiding a "journeyman"--to use the over-the-top term you seem to prefer.

    But Dempsey holds his rating with me, as you haven't made solid or pertinent arguments and hardly anything you have posted is at all convincing.
     
  9. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    Very good points.

    There is one distinction between many of the Dempsey critics and most of the Wills critics, at least on this board.

    Many of the Dempsey critics merely point to facts. He did not defend against Wills and Greb. He lost to Tunney. Many, if not most, would say these were the three best fighters out there during his reign.

    The Wills critics really seem to want to tear him down as a fighter.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,104
    Mar 21, 2007
    And it all rather misses the point anyway. Say Wills was just a journeyman (which is ludicrous), it's up to Dempsey to prove that in a purely sporting sense. The colour line didn't just impact the legacies of black fighters, but white fighters also. Demspey is such a fighter.
     
  11. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Pointing to what you call facts but ignoring the historically known details is as disingenuous as it comes.

    As usual details of historic events provide understanding.
     
  12. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011

    "I do wonder whether the writers even saw the punch if they didn't mention the action of hitting on the break."

    On the post by Senya of the Brooklyn Eagle, there is a description of the fight on the right-hand side by D C Vreeland. This is what he says about the punch.

    "Firpo moved back. His hands were down. He had not learned, but he was soon to learn, that it is a bad thing to retreat from an American no matter what his color, and not have his hands ready to defend himself."
     
  13. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Ed, feel free to drop him 50 places nobody will say anything, you know why? It's only your opinion. It's clear anything Wills done is great, everything Dempsey is not as good. You will grab at anything to make a point, take things out of context, out of sequence, it doesnt matter to you. For example the John Lester Johnson fight, so please you have my permission to drop Dempsey to the last spot. Do you know what will happen when you publish "Ed's Top ___, the sun will still come up and nobody will agree with it, cos ITS ONLY YOUR OPINION. Sometimes I feel like a bully answering your posts cos you are trying to argue something you know little about.

    What do you think that says? That Wills, would have been an underdog in the betting, if they had fought. Wills HIMSELF BLEW his shot. He had to go 12 boring rds against a fat, out of condition Firpo and Dempsey did what to Firpo? Oh, yes the only thing you see is that, Dempsey was pushed out of the ring and knocked down. FYI, Dempsey took chances, cos he had ba-lls, and wasn't afraid to mix it up with a bigger powerful guy. Unlike your hero, who "fought" a wrestling match. A fight that people til this day still look at as one of the most exciting fights. There have been reams of articles written, on that fight. Wills, on the other hand went 12 mediocre rds, a writer was so impressed by Wills great performance that he wrote the following:


    "After the first two rds the FIGHT was a good wrestling match. They hugged and mauled other and did little else."

    "taking it by and large it was the sorriest contest for a top price of $27.50, including war tax of 10% that was ever staged or probably ever will be staged"

    in Wills own words:

    "I would have knocked Firpo out if Firpo would have opened more instead of fighting continually at close"

    The reporter commenting on this quote by your hero.

    "Although it seemed to observers that Wills was DOING MOST OF THE HOLDING."


    Yessir, your hero is blaming Firpo cos he wouldn't let him hit him:lol::lol:. Where was Wills tremendous speed, his terrific power, his
    great skill, that blazing jab and great left hook????

    Now compare, since you are great at that, the Wills performance against fattie Firpo and Dempsey's performance, against a trim, in condition Firpo. ITS NO CONTEST.

    If you really look at Wills record, he done more pre Dempsey, so why not dump on Willard.

    You know why you wont, cos Willard doesnt carry the weight Dempsey does.

    Dempsey didn't take advantage of the fan's like Wills did, and defrauded the fan's by going through the motions, Dempsey made his fights exciting Wills on the other hand made his fights boring
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,251
    Feb 15, 2006
    I don’t give Dempsey’s critics a free pass on this.

    I think that many of them have become emotionally invested, and that this can cloud their objectivity.
     
  15. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Mc, Let me ask you a question, what is a journeyman? In many field, such as a journeyman plumber, a journeyman electrician? They are guys who have some knowledge but are not masters of their fields. Tell me what was Wills the master of? The visual evidence points to Wills not being the master of anything besides holding and hitting, hitting on the break, wrestling. If Wills had any standout skills don't you think those clips from 1924 would show something of them? Yes he was not the same as when he was younger, but skill and experience are still there. Maybe you could say he wasn't as fast or that his reflexes weren't what they used to be, but skills they stay with you, if you had a jab, it
    might not be as fast but you would still have it. Wills showed the same style and inclination to grab, hit and hold, in both fights that are on youtube. That's got to tell you something.

    With Greb you could say whatever cos there is no visual evidence, not so with Wills.

    Wills had a chance to prove his worth with a gimme and he failed miserably, tell me it's not true, tell me he looked good and based only on that fight that he didn't blow it.