That Mundine has only ever beaten 2 really credible boxers......... and Both of them were Aussies.:think Does that say more about Aussie Boxing or Mundine's choice of opponent? Of course.......if one listens to the nuthuggers.......Green is no good anyway.......so that leaves one credible boxer that Mundine has beaten in his whole career. :hey WOW........ I bet Kessler is shaking in his boots. HA HA HA....... and this pansy is gonna Unify the Division.......:deal Yeah......right...... :roll:
and the snooze continues. Has anyone ever noticed Oz talking about anyone other than Mundine? Get the fat ***** talking about Motorbikes or ***** will you'se, he likes these topics as well. If Oz responds with his usual "on ignored list Ha Ha" we all know it is code for "I am currently stalking Mundines backside".
You all get the picture. He probably doesnt even realise I am talking about him. This man likes backside.
Ah yes....... but I got exactly the reaction i wanted from the nuthuggers...... 4 ignored posts already..... The fishing has been great.
How can you say that? Here are his opponents and there record at the time of the fight. Zohs 9-10-2 Taumafai 18-18-0 Stanton 6-12-0 McLeod 15-7-1 Bergero 23-7-2 Masua 13-13-0 Makata 20-3-1 Pompey 32-17-3 Soliman 12-6-0 Waters 25-6-1 Ottke 24-0-0 loss Mayo 15-8-0 Francis 22-10-4 Obah 19-3-0 Ellis 41-7-0 Botes 23-8-0 Thornburry 27-4-0 Sullivan 50-13-0 Cacciatore 30-6-0 Echols 29-4-1 Nishizawa 24-13-5 Siaca 17-4-0 loss Sullivan 51-15-0 Dowling 12-2-0 Castillo 9-7-1 Kessler 35-0-0 loss Matumla 30-7-1 Nee 10-6-2 Green 21-2-0 Acosta 12-1-4 Soliman 38-8-0 Nievas 17-1-1
Exactly....... Now let's play a game........ It's called ....... "Name a Credible Opponent"........... (who he defeated) :deal
Thank **** for that....... My luck is changing for the better. CHATABOX This message is hidden because CHATABOX is on your ignore list.</SPAN>
I think you're stretching this a bit too far Oz. Green, Soliman, and Echolls were all credible opponents that he beat. By the same token, Kessler would have 4 credible opponents on his resume (Siaca, Mundine, Beyer, and Andrade), and he's had 10 more fights that Mundine.
Gee........ Am I supposed to be concerned because a Newbie repeats word perfect another person's post? :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl FFSatsch It's been tried before........ The opinions of humourless dumb**** nuthuggers don't matter a ****. Specifically......... dumb**** "Newbie" Nuthuggers. It's called stirring the pot :roll: I am surrounded by Dumb**** Shitheads. :hi:
And Kessler won every fight convincingly........ also doesn't have a History of Ducking the hard fights like Mundine. Mundine has been offered the shot at Kessler's Title/Titles twice and knocked him back.......and then goes crying that Kessler is avoiding him. Given Mundine's past history,there is absolutely no way that Mundine will fight either Kessler or Calzaghe till there is no available option. It's the Nuthuggers who say that Green was rat****....... not me. Echols was gone by the time he fought Mundine...... Since his comeback fight ....... Echols has won 2 from 7 and those 2 were against opponents who have won 1 from 10 and 2 from 10 in their last 10 fights......Hardly a glowing endorsement. And Mundine fought Echols in his first comeback fight after layoff when Echols would have been at his worst. That leaves Soliman.:deal
Well, if i happen to repeat another person's post, a post which I never read before, maybe there is some truth to that opinion? You would be well advised to seek some phychiatric treatment.