Has anyone clearly lost by Compubox numbers, but deservedly won the fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Feb 22, 2010.


  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Exactly.

    Compubox means **** all. I laugh when people claim a fighter deserved to win a fight and then use Compubox as "evidence".

    Anyway, according to Compubox Jones was outlanded by a very slight margin to Tarver, but the decision was fair.
     
  2. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009

    Agreed. You can't base a fight on math.
     
  3. tepaltzin

    tepaltzin Guest


    Big misconception that FLoyd swept the first 5 rounds. Castillo started connecting with some good stuff as early as the 3rd round.

    The fight should be on Youtube!
     
  4. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Pac-JMM II

    JMM landed more punches, much higher % rate.
     
  5. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,005
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    B-Hop/Calzaghe
     
  6. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    I think that Compubox had Whittaker landing more punches than Delahoya,but i didnt seem that way, And iMo Oscar won the fight clearly 115-112
     
  7. puertorricane

    puertorricane Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,242
    3
    Jan 25, 2010
    if you guys are taking compubox seriously then you must not know too much about boxing and rely on what the commentators are saying as well.. compubox is overrated and not accurate

    :hat
     
  8. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    Feb 6, 2007

    Only because they can't face the harsh truth that Hopkins was beaten quite easily by Calzaghe. Additionally this was on a show promoted by Hopkins promoter, in America, with an American referee, and three American judges