Has Bob Fitzsimmons Got A Legit Claim As The Gretest Fighter Of All Time?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Frazier Hook, Dec 28, 2009.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007
    Here is James Toney explaining the amazing diet that keeps him from going all pathetic:

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS2CSDUt_uQ[/ame]
     
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    In that case Vitali Klitschko should rank higher in terms of all-time greatness than Jack Johnson, and Andrew Golota should rank higher than Rocky Marciano.

    :patsch
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
     
  4. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Toney is past it and fat but still has 100,000,000,000% more skilled than anyone from the 1890s, plus hes more muscled than anyone from that era bar Jeffries
     
  5. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    You are arguing that a 160 version of Duran beats Fitzsimmons? How exactly would he deal with Fitzsimmon's power and aggression and strength? Duran would be bullied all around the ring, and that's saying something when we are talking about Roberto Duran.
     
  6. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,628
    1,894
    Dec 2, 2006
    Fitz was a winner and a thinker, in any era he would be great. He had the physical ability and mental strenght and intellegence to be a force at any time.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol:
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    The same way he dealt with Barkley who was a bigger puncher, more aggressive, and brought way more pressure than Fitz. Barkley probably KOs Fitz
     
  9. JimmyShimmy

    JimmyShimmy 1050 psi Full Member

    646
    10
    Jul 26, 2004
    I'd prefer to fight Hearn's over Fitzsimmons, that's for sure.

    It matters not when you were around, you don't have a career likes Fitzsimmons' and come away not knowing much about fistic combat.

    One time "Fitzsimmons was not happy with his training quarters so he just punched it in the canal." NY Times, 1896, July 12th, P36.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007

    :lol:
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  11. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    So muscled equat to greatness, then? That's practically what you are saying there. Number one, that's bull**** - Toney is fat, a lot fatter than a number of guys from 'that era' as you put it. And number two, according to you they were all fat and unconditioned. So how were they about to go 20/25 rounds?
     
  12. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    By what virtue is Barkley a bigger puncher than Fitzsimmons?

    We'll forget this debate anyway. We'll get back to what Bokaj said, why can't we accept that Fitzsimmons did great things in his own era? It's pointless trying to take him out of that era, chuck him into today's scene and then debating how he'd do.
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Muscle is important it helps bones extend quickly but its only 1 of many factors. The main difference is the 1,000,000,000,000,000% improvement in skill Toney has over them

    They could go 20-25 rounds because they threw 3punches a round
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Barkley was a beast who took guys out wearing bigger gloves and seems to have more torque in his shots
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,595
    27,266
    Feb 15, 2006