Has Hopkins officially earned the title "Greatest Middleweight Ever"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hussleman, Jun 5, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,242
    Sep 15, 2009
    Top 15 definitely. But beating joppy, holmes, tito and hoya isn't enough to make him the greatest.

    Other middleweights have achieved a lot more.

    Monzon and hagler both ruled for longer with more defences. Greb and ruby had better successes at a higher weight.

    Burley was avoided like the plague.

    Being serious now actually you could argue that langford's victories over ketchel and flowers surpass hopkins best victories at middleweight.

    I'd certainly argue that charles beating burley and moore is far superior to any hopkins victory.

    Hopkins is top 15 at mw. If he carries on long enough and beats the right people he might make it at lhw also. His longevity and age are amazing. He is a great great fighter we don't need to hype him up so much.
     
  2. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    58,825
    14,056
    Jul 28, 2009
    Greatest at middleweight alone? No.
    Greatest to fight at middleweight? No, no.
     
  3. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,412
    29,762
    Apr 4, 2005
    Hopkins is my favourite fighter of all time but his resume at middleweight simply isn't good enough for him to be the best of all time. He's right up there with Hagler, Monzon and SRR but I can't see a case for him being made to definitively rank him above them all.
     
  4. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    Weak ass resume. For me monzon is the goat middleweight
     
  5. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    6
    Aug 7, 2010
  6. Shmoopy

    Shmoopy Guest


    ummm... no, that would go to Joe Calzaghe :yep
     
  7. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    His accomplishments at Middleweight are the reasons why he is ranked highly at Middleweight. Why would his achievements outside of Middleweight affect/bump up his accomplishments at Middleweight?
     
  8. DON1

    DON1 ICEMAN Full Member

    5,221
    1,200
    Apr 6, 2006
  9. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    If you're a ****ing idiot and started watching boxing in 1995 then yes.
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    definitely. could and should. Although I'd venture to say a guy like Hearns at MW was a whole lot better than any MW Hopkins ever faced.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,242
    Sep 15, 2009
    Given boxedears decision to forego signatures, you are now the holder of esb's best signature by my reckoning!
     
  12. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Hopkins beats Greb anyday day of the week. Also, Hopkins was 40 when he lost a controversial decision to Jermain Taylor. Hopkins is 46 and still a P4P great fighter. When most of those people on your list reach 30 they had already peaked and wasn't performing at a high level like Hopkins!
     
  13. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    31,542
    7,525
    Oct 5, 2009
    how do you jump to that conclusion
     
  14. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    You actually would pick Greb to beat Hopkins? If so explain? Hopkins does lose to that guy. Hopkins has old time skill mix in with a new style swag!
     
  15. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,012
    17,496
    Jul 19, 2004
    1. Hagler
    2. Monzon
    3. Greb
    4. Robinson
    5. Hopkins