Has Mayweather always fought the best available

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Liston3, Jun 10, 2009.


  1. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    Pretty much. hernandez, Castillo, Corrales all considered the top guys when Floyd beat them. I think that starting with the Gatti fight is when he started to fall off a bit. He made a lot of money against Gatti and since then is only worried about chasing big paydays.
     
  2. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    He did Pacquiao a favor by taking that fight. Let's face it, if he fought Pac and Marquez was still available then people will be all over Pac's ass for having to fight Marquez even if he beats Mayweather. By Mayweather/Marquez fighting then Pac takes the winner no one will be complaining about Pac having to fight the loser of that fight and he's free to go.
     
  3. preciseI247

    preciseI247 Member Full Member

    483
    8
    Apr 20, 2008

    Yeah it would have been genious to come back and fight the #1 p4p fighter in the world after a two year layoff as opposed to taking a 25 million dollar tune up fight.
     
  4. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    134
    Jul 20, 2004
  5. Solid Chin

    Solid Chin Concrete Wars Full Member

    3,953
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    This content is protected
     
  6. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    co-sign:deal
     
  7. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    The poll isn't asking whether he is justified in the decision. Simply in whether he fought the best available
     
  8. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    134
    Jul 20, 2004
    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  9. preciseI247

    preciseI247 Member Full Member

    483
    8
    Apr 20, 2008
    I was responding to the direct comment that Floyd should have fought Pac right after a layoff as opposed to Marquez.
     
  10. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    Gotcha. In relation to this thread how much sense the decision makes is irrelevant. Simply put is the opponent that Floyd chose the best one available. The answer is a pretty clear no IMO.
     
  11. stefanoitch

    stefanoitch Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,755
    0
    Jan 6, 2009
  12. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    what i mean is..... there mentality could have been

    why fight pacman now....

    if they want me to fight pacman... i could get away with fighting jmm.. rake in some extra money and then fight pacman later down the line...

    both fights are fairly winnable - not risky - and will bring me a lot of $
     
  13. Shane

    Shane Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,645
    0
    Jul 28, 2007
    No, but to his credit he has had a great career thus far and has made a lot of money.
     
  14. pugilist_boyd

    pugilist_boyd BUSTED UP PUG Full Member

    830
    3
    Jun 19, 2007
    this is a joke he prob. wont fight sugar shane untill shane hits 45 or starts fading,he,s been ducking cotto for 2 years
     
  15. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Disappointing. Such obvious, obvious bias. His resume is good, he has fought some strong comp, but OF COURSE he did not always fight the best available. Have you undergone therapy to block out the very existence of Tszyu, Mosley, Williams, Cotto and Margarito??