Has Mayweather ever fought a PRIME ATG and beat them?

He lost? :rofl Good luck selling that **** you nut :nut

 

I never said the fight matters. I've been consistent. If you won't take my word I don't know what to tell you.

 

So youre finally admitting that Barerra was not prime when Pacquaio beat him in 2003.... im starting to like this joker, at least hes honest:thumbsup

 

Okay whatever you say. Too bad for you #48 is younger than PBF and was said to be the fresher fighter after his performances against Bradley and Chris A. It was PBF who was said to have lost a step with his two fights against Maidana. PBF beats any version of #48 better and more complete fighter and will be remembered historically as such and already is.:deal Deal with it.:hi:

 

You have no credibility. You said Morales II was a better win for Pac than Barrera I.

 

PBF is a better fighter than Hatton or #48, longevity is part of greatness dummy.:deal

 

Correct. Two problems though, 1) boxingmaster is a troll so nothing he says is even taken serious. The only reason you take him serious is either because a) you're his alt or b) you have something in common: Pacquiao. 2) this very topic has been rehashed for ages and someone who's had an account since 2013 (boxingmaster) should know this and have seen this repeat thread a million times already.

On another note, if Mayweather is a scared, cherry picking, feather fisted fraud that was forced to fight the one ATG, stylistically and skilled enough to beat him, and still beat him. What does that make Pacquiao? :think

 

He already knows this but simply can't come to terms with it like most Pac****s. PBF is the best fighter of this era bar none.

 

Nope 60+ pro fights=s a burned out 29 year old fighter that is MAB:deal...i bet you thought mayorga beat a 29 year old prime Vargas too huh?atsch

 

What good is longevity if you never fight a prime ATG?

 

Don't tell me anything because your word is ****.

 

Robinson was fresh after 100 fights.