has pac ever defended any lineal title he won?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ReturnofTheKing, Jan 20, 2010.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 1 of 2
  1. ReturnofTheKing

    ReturnofTheKing Member Full Member

    418
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    the true measure of a champion is not only winning a sanctioned title but defending it..in the case of pac he has never defended any lineal title he won.. SUCCESSFULLY...:deal

    how can a guy who has never dominated any weight class he has been inbe called p4p the best..:blood

    pac has a total of 5 title defenses in the 5 weight classes he won titles..ring is not a title so the hatton 140 fight and barrera 126 fight :dealwasn't for any title.

    truly pathetic in terms of boxing historical standards..lol
     
    ReturnofTheKing, Jan 20, 2010
    ReturnofTheKing, Jan 20, 2010
    #1
  2. hellblazer

    hellblazer All-Time Great™ Full Member

    5,509
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
     
    hellblazer, Jan 20, 2010
    hellblazer, Jan 20, 2010
    #2
  3. MexicanJew

    MexicanJew Jajajajajaja Full Member

    7,315
    3
    May 19, 2008
    :desk:desk:desk:desk:desk:desk:desk:desk



    Jeus, someone make this **** stop. Im considering abandoning this forum entirely. Its like being force fed bull**** by cracked out ******s.
     
    MexicanJew, Jan 20, 2010
    MexicanJew, Jan 20, 2010
    #3
  4. hmm

    hmm damn chairs Full Member

    4,992
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    hmm says . . .

    ok.............





    shiiiii I'll still call him p4p, but yeah I would love to see him make more title defenses... lineal or not, it don't matter... Can't blame him for wanting to weight jump and make history.... I'm hoping he'll still be around long enough (before he retires "so-called" after 2-3 fights) to try to be undisputed in WW... that's hoping he faces PBF, Mosley, Berto, or whomever big WW name if he gets past Clottey.
     
    hmm, Jan 20, 2010
    hmm, Jan 20, 2010
    #4
  5. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L073xTrriZE[/ame]
     
    caneman, Jan 20, 2010
    caneman, Jan 20, 2010
    #5
  6. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    Flyweight title against Gabriel Mira.

    Now explain this quote:

     
    KOTF, Jan 20, 2010
    KOTF, Jan 20, 2010
    #6
  7. MattMattMatt

    MattMattMatt Guest

    I totally agree. It's getting out of hand.
     
    MattMattMatt, Jan 20, 2010
    MattMattMatt, Jan 20, 2010
    #7
  8. theHawtness

    theHawtness Active Member Full Member

    1,321
    0
    Apr 2, 2007

    that's because he's been weight jumping which, IMO, is more impressive than dominating a division.
     
    theHawtness, Jan 20, 2010
    theHawtness, Jan 20, 2010
    #8
  9. coupdegrace

    coupdegrace Active Member Full Member

    966
    0
    Dec 5, 2008




    it looked yummy till i saw the head. :lol:
     
    coupdegrace, Jan 20, 2010
    coupdegrace, Jan 20, 2010
    #9
  10. AbbasKhan6428

    AbbasKhan6428 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,810
    0
    Jun 2, 2008
    buh pacquiao is the greatest fighter of all time so its ok :rofl:rofl oh n STFU he beat linear champs so badly that there trainers quit boxing
     
    AbbasKhan6428, Jan 20, 2010
    AbbasKhan6428, Jan 20, 2010
    #10
  11. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    The ring may not be a title in your eyes but when he beat Barerra he won the lineal title no doubt about it and he defended it so stfu

    I tend to look at it the other way...

    Pac fought :

    Morales 3 times

    Barerra 2nd fight

    Oscar de lay hoya

    Oscar larios

    all in NON TITLE FIGHTS

    this speaks volumes , title dont mean too much when you look at the bigger picture
     
    doylexxx, Jan 20, 2010
    doylexxx, Jan 20, 2010
    #11
  12. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    pac this floyd that pac this floyd that.

    theres more to boxing than these 2 fighters.
     
    Relentless, Jan 20, 2010
    Relentless, Jan 20, 2010
    #12
  13. k2fan

    k2fan Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    786
    0
    Sep 27, 2007
    :good
     
    k2fan, Jan 20, 2010
    k2fan, Jan 20, 2010
    #13
  14. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    he defended his lineal FW title against the most avoided fighter in the sport at the time, Juan Manuel Marquez.

    Has this ever been done before? For a fighter to move to a new weightclass, win the lineal championship in his first fight against a prime ATG (Barrera), and then succesfully defend it in his very next fight against another prime ATG (JMM)?

    thats ****ing amazing.
     
    PH|LLA, Jan 20, 2010
    PH|LLA, Jan 20, 2010
    #14
  15. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    pac neither lost his title in the ring..

    imagine, 7 titles and never lost in the belt in the ring..
     
    asero, Jan 20, 2010
    asero, Jan 20, 2010
    #15
Page 1 of 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.