Has Pac faught the best at every weight since leaving 130?

Didn't a lot of fighters not want to fight Floyd at 140? Pac has fought sub pac competition consecutively before as well, and like Floyd, it was when they were both on the way up. If Floyd or Pac fought that kind of competition now, then they would both be rediculed.

 

I see...another thread about "I prefer this fighter" :|

"your fighter is not better than mine":|

Yeah nice...

 

floyd gets a lot of flak because he doesn't want to fight the best welterweights even if he was fighting at 147 for a couple of years now while claiming to be the best. pac, in his just 2nd fight at 147 and 3rd fight above 130 is now fighting miguel cotto who is one of the best welters. team pac was even accused of cashing-out when he went up straight from 135 to 147 just to fight oscar remember? oscar was supoosed to kill pac with a jab. lol

 

135 back at the time when pac and jmm moved-up was not that strong so fighting david diaz is just fine for a test at the waters above 130. i want casa more than david diaz for pac that time because i felt that casa is right for the pickings and an easier fight becase of his previous outings with santa cruz and katsidis and casa has the lineal title to be picked. juan diaz was coming from a loss to nate back then so the real man at the weight was nate campbell. oscar and hatton was a much better opponent than campbell at 135.

 

I'd rather see Pac clean out 135 and 140 because there are more prime fighters who are hungry in those 2 divisions than at 147. Of course, Mayweather is going to fight Pac at 147. I think Pac has no business in the welterweight division.

 

Are you blaming Pac for giving barrera a rematch?atsch

Third fight was a joke, Pac should have gave Morales a catchweight at 132. hindsight being 20/20. HELLO, people would have pitchforks in hand if a third fight wasn't made. I guess you are blaming Pac for fighters getting old overnight also.

Point is, Pac fought Morales and LOST to Morales. I don't care what you fools say, Morales was not shot when he beat Pac and when he fought him the 2nd time around.

He fought the best and he lost to the best in his prime. No shame losing to Erik f'n Morales.

 

MAB took 4 years to have decide to fight pac again. the TR-GBP tussle over pac's contract also make the rematch a little hard to make. MAB wants pac as his final fight back then and obviously, he could get a pac fight even if he just loss to JMM back then just because of his status and his position at GBP back then. remember that MAB along with bhop and shane were all partners of oscar at GBP?

and JMM was not sidelined permanetly because after MAB, he got a crack again with pac and that was also 4 years in the making.

the 3rd morales fight should not have happened but it was morales camp's option, iirc, if they want to exercise a 3rd fight. for fighting pac again a third time, morales has alot of guts. was pac suppose to turn down a 3rd fight and a closing of the trilogy?

 

That happens a lot here. When one set of fans can't dispute a statement they instead focus on a fighter that poster likes. It seems like this is a hate thread but the only answer to this thread is no.

 

DAMN IF YOU DO DAMN IF YOU DONT FOR PAC

A) if PAC DID NOT FIGHT MORALES. PAC will be accused fo DUCKING MORALES

B) when PAC pulvurized MORALES in the third fight, they are now singing a different tune. They now say, PAC should not have fought Morales coz Morales is already SHOT!

lol::smoke

 

AHAH man! Thats it.:good

 

Of course he's fought the best - David Diaz at lightweight, prime Hatton at LWW and almost prime DLH at welter. Stop being a hater dude

 

Bradley fought Campbell because it was the logical choice, past it/old or not, he needed to fight him. Do you think people would have forgiven Pac for not fighting EM. This is when you can spot a hater.

We'll see in some time, if Bradley gets bigger, I can't wait to see how his wins vs Campbell, Witter and Holt are viewed by the some of his fans that are some of the most critical Pac haters.

If we use their reason, Bradley has fought no one at all .

You can scrutinize **** like that forever, for every fighter.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl