Has Pacman fought anybody as good as Mosley?

your twisting it all up though..u dont know margo had bricks in his gloves and u dont know that tony was distracted that night..he probably was...BUT THATS ALL SPECULATION..ALOT OF PEOPLE SAY THAT TONY WAS TAILORMADE FOR SHANE....I SAID THAT BEFORE THE MOSLEY-MARGARITO FIGHT AND I WAS TOLD I WAS FULL OF $HIT..NOW THOSE SAME POSTERS ARE TELLING ME THAT "TONY WAS TAILORMADE FOR SHANE"..

BUT THAN THE SAME POSTERS CHANGE THEIR ARGUMENT AND SAY" WELL TONY WAS DISTRACTED"..WHICH IS IT? WAS HE TAILOR MADE OR WAS HE DISTRACTED:huh

 

:rofl 1 loss makes you shot. If PBF fought Cotto he would have been prime.

Mosley struggled with mayorga just a fight before, he fought Margo who was tailor made for him and I predicted Mosley to beat him, on top of that we find out Margo didnt get his bricks either.

How fickle are you, a 38yr old guy gets 1 impressive performance in, he is prime. A 29yr old guy looses 1 fight, he is shot. Clottey gave margo all he could handle and Pac beat him.

Get this, its called styles. Pac ANIHILATED MAB at 126, does that mean MAB was shot? Well the fickle people like you said he was shot. Next 2 fights he beats Morales. Does that mean Morales was shot and MAB was prime? Morales beats Pac.

Its simply styles. Mosley beat Margo cos Margo was tailor made for him, Cotto beat Mosley in a close even match and Cotto got battered with bricks. Doesnt mean either fighter gets shot and prime over 1 fight.

My god.

 

And its all speculation that Cotto was shot and "mentally damaged" against Margo.

Its BS. Cotto beat Shane. No 2 ways about it, those 3 guys are probably in or around the same level, just a case of styles. Although I can honestly say, Im not sure if Margo is on that level now he is without his bricks.

 

No you moron. It is the TYPE of loss. Had he been caught by a lucky clean shot? I wouldn't say it meant anything.

How did he lose? He was stalked, worn down, and brutally pounded into submission. His next fight he showed the EXACT same body language in the later rounds of not wanting to engage and wanting to be anywhere but in that ring.

How fickle am I? You idiot I also think that Mosley wasn't the best Mosley. I just said that Mosley was a WW title holder, had beat the man who beat the man, and was challenging another legit title holder in Berto. He may have looked like crap against Berto, but most people I knew favored him to beat Berto. Your example is ignorant because it has nothing to do with my analysis. Losing isn't the point!

It is styles to a point, this is a different discussion. Cotto isn't the same mentally. Anyone who knows anything about boxing will tell you that. Yes, one fight can change a man just like one bad crash changes a race car driver. Doesn't mean the guy can't fight, but he will NEVER be the same again. He left too much of himself in the ring.

God won't save you.

 

Haha you are dumb. Margo had an iron chin, Cotto was backing up and couldnt hurt him, more than likely Margo was hitting him with bricks too.

Was that the first time you seen Cotto back away? He backed away and "boxed" Mosley too :deal

Sure sure, cos you are a psychologist and has had a lengthy discussion with Cotto about his mental state. Moron. Stick to facts.

MAB was battered into submission by Pac too. Everyone called him shot afterwards. He beat Morales after. Everyone called Morales shot afterwards. Morales beats Pac afterwards.

Thats the sort of fickle behaviour you are showing. Too stupid really.

 

What the hell does "iron chin" have to do with the way Margo pounded Cotto into sand? I agree with your brick comment and it further proves my point. Cotto is a changed man.

"Boxing" is completely different and has different body language than "escaping". Cotto was BOXING Mosley. Cotto was "escaping" from Margarito and Clottey.

Stick to facts? You are a moron. Anyone who watches boxing knows that brutal fights sap a fighter. Every human being is mentally and physically different! So one guy eating punches may result in a headache. Another guy eating the same punches may result in Parkinson's or even death. No two fights are the same. No two fighters are the same.

Given this knowledge what we do is... Look at the fighter in front of us! When we do that? Cotto is different than he was pre-Margarito. Nobody can deny this! IMHO, the fact they put him in with a pitty pat puncher shows what his team thinks. Collazo? :good Berto? :thumbsup Williams? No Yuri Foreman! :huh

However talking to you I can see you are to ignorant to see the writing on the wall. Like most *******s. :verysad

(We are still awaiting an evaluation of Mosley.)

 

Because against Margo, Mosley did not incur in ramdon testing and he
could have used EPO which gave him a lot stamina. Against Floyd, he could not use it (because of the ramdon testing) and his stamina only lasted 2 rounds.

 

:nut you're boring

 

Cotto beat a better version of Mosley than Floyd.

You will have guys trying to explain to you with just about everything they can think of that Pac beat a shot/past it Cotto but no, Cotto just fights that way when he really gets broken down and discouraged. Happened against Margo, happened against Pac. Mosley didn't make Cotto shot, he just felt Marg's pressure and collapsed, same with Pac.

And Cotto DID back away from Mosley at times, towards the end especially. Mosley just didn't pressure enough to make him wilt, and couldn't completely deal with his jab.

 

I see you defending your idol Floyd everywhere.

 

Cotto is as good as a 38 year old Shane.That was a big win for Pac.

 

Cotto just beat Clottey, destroy Jennings, gave Pac a tough fight for 4 rounds and according to you he is shot.

Mosley has been inactive for 18 months, 38 years old, gassed out completely after the 2nd round and we are still awaiting evaluation? :rofl

Bias what...?

 

I think Cotto was as good as a 38 year old, innactive Mosley.