Has the heavyweight division ever sucked as much as today?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by red cobra, Nov 10, 2012.


  1. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,883
    8,159
    May 18, 2006
    I recollect reading Jeff Ryan bemoaning the state of the heavyweight division in Ring magazine back in 1994 and saying how bad Bowe,Lewis and Moorer were compared to Ali, Frazier and Norton and that Tyson needed to come back and clean up the heavyweight mess.

    The 90's are now considered up with the 70's as the richest period in Heavyweight history and in hindsight Ryan was being a nostalgist, moaning *****.

    Now I'm not saying this era is anything to write home about and last nights fight was **** and Wach was probably the least skilled fighter I've see contest a title in 25 years but at one point in the 90's the 3 alphabet champs were Frank Bruno, Frans Botha and Bruce Seldon. I'd much rather a fighter of Wladimir Klitschko's calibre ruling the roost than anyone as poor as that lot again.

    That said boxing can't take too many more Mormecks, Wach's, Peters or Eddie Chambers getting shots at the title when woefully undeserving of them. Fight fans deserve better than that garbage. There has to be better challengers out there than that surely?
     
  2. Tonifranz

    Tonifranz Active Member Full Member

    731
    11
    May 3, 2009
    Aren't the Klitschkos truly talented, motivated fighters, who had already cut through the division like knife through butter among the lumbering bohemoths in recent years?
     
  3. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,059
    Oct 25, 2006
    I agree. What's he really done at the weight?
     
  4. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,059
    Oct 25, 2006
    This is largely why I feel frustrated watching the division. It's not that Wlad and his brother are bad...it's that most of the rest of them are. Wach was tough, but right now I could throw a better jab and right hand than that. Honest to God.

    We want to see competitive fights. I'm hoping some of the younger crop can give Wlad a run for his money sometime down the line.
     
  5. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,883
    8,159
    May 18, 2006
    I believe you mate.

    If it weren't for his courage I'd have laughed out loud at Wachs display.

    He was so ****ing clumsy and slow I seriously couldn't see how he was still undefeated. Primo Carnera looked like Muhummad Ali compared to Mariusz Wach.
     
  6. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,059
    Oct 25, 2006
    And that's no exaggeration! :lol:
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Is Mariusz Wach any worse than Chuck Wepner, J-P Coopman, Richard Dunn ?
    He'd probably beat them.


    Let's be clear about one thing : a lot of the better, younger crop after really not interested in challenging Wladimir Klitschko !
    Remember, Povetkin was a live fighter a few years back and Wlad's mandatory contender yet he has refused to step up to the plate.
    Chambers made his challenge but was so demoralized by his defeat he'll never be the same again.
    Guys like Price and Fury, if they are even any good, do need more seasoning, but they will be looking toward Vitali IF they want a Klitschko at all, and praying that Wlad starts to show signs of decline as he nears 37 years of age.
     
  8. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,586
    Jul 28, 2004
    of course they are, and I acknowledged that from the very beginning in starting this thread, I'm referring to a new, upcoming fighter somewhere out there, like a a young Joe Louis or Mike Tyson,...cutting a new swath From the fringes, somewhere out there, I'm awaiting a new face, a young terror who will emerge from the pack, whether the K bros are still around or not. i just don't see it happening as yet.
     
  9. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,270
    Sep 5, 2011
    I don't see putting down the past on size complaints. Those champions were big enough to beat anyone in the world in thier own time and put on exciting fights.

    the big fellows now certainly can beat anyone in the world, but they put on dull fights.

    By the way, Marciano's era is put down but 5 of his 7 championship fight were against Hall-of-Famers. He won the title from an above-average sized champion for that era in Walcott (about 195 in great shape) and beat a large ex-champion (Louis) on the way up.

    **I am a fan of American football which also suffers from giganticism but don't remember in the old days feeling cheated that Bob Lilly was only 260 lbs rather than 360 lbs. Most of us thought 260 was pretty big.
     
  10. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    59
    May 4, 2007
    I disagree. On the whole, the heavyweight division today is okay. It's just that things are a lot more physical now, and with increased size comes a decrease in speed, manouverability and options.

    It's for a reason that the featherweights have a higher skill-level than the heavyweights. You need it more there. A good chin and a good punch does a lot. Compare middleweights to welterweights, and the welterweights look more impressive, if you consider their power and chin equal.

    The heavyweight division has changed, and should a superheavyweight-division be created, it would create the appearance of a resurgance of skill in the regular heavyweight division. But at the same time, it would be diluted compared to the current one.

    Name five swarmers of note in the heavyweight division in the last decade. With the amount of punchers, their breed is becoming extinct at the weight.
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005

    :patsch

    Haye has too much power, speed, athleticism, and slick head movement for Sultan.
     
  12. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,586
    Jul 28, 2004
    You overrate Haye.
     
  13. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,726
    1,683
    Jul 8, 2010
    What was wrong with Eddie Chambers fighting for the title? He's one of the most deserving challengers in recent years, and certainly one of the more skilled.
     
  14. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,586
    Jul 28, 2004
    Nothing at all! in fact he was probably one of the most deserving of a mediocre lot. The Klitschkos can't be held to blame for the lack of quality of their division. I think Wlad could go on for a couple more years, easily, but really, maybe it's time soon to retire. There's nothing left for him to prove.
     
  15. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,802
    2,402
    Aug 26, 2004
    I dont know each era had its share of poor challengers even in the 70's, there was Foreman Ali and Frazier, Norton but also a lot of guys that were worse than today....I think each era has its plus and minuses