Has there ever been a fighter who had a CONTROVERSY-FREE zero?

Frank Bruno.

Only 2 of his fights didn't end in a KO\TKO. UD Over Mccall, an a 10 rounder win over Phillip Brown were he didn't drop a point.

 

Just watched it again. I had Lopez winning by a point but it could have went either way. Regardless, it's on his record as a draw - I said that none of his wins are controversial, which I stand by. The only close fight was the Alvarez re-match but I don't think his win was controversial.

 

No really truly talented great fighter has a zero at the end of their careers. Only those who have been carefully managed have zeros, and they aren't really great as much as well managed.

 

id say ibeauchi and valero.

their are some worse examples like sutherland.

then some prospect examples like kirkland, murray, chisora, degale etc

 

Hamidi outboxed Murray that one is controversial

 

was that the one in vegas? cos he has had a couple of dodgy performances in america.

 

JC Chavez sr. was controversy free (87-0) until the Pernell "draw" as far as I know. But then it was directly very controversial!

 

Mike Tyson

 

I don`t think there is any fighter that had a controversy free zero because there aren`t that many fighters that retired with a zero at the end of their records.

 

Marvin hagler?? I know there were some controversial decisions he lost but I cant think of any the other way around

 

how many world champs retired undefeated?

lopez
floyd
marciano
valero
calzaghe
ottke

who else?

the only one out of them with no controversial wins is valero.

 

eduardo lause. every win by KO except a single DQ

 

You could add a lot more fighters if the criteria was "no controversial decisions", meaning their wins and losses are counted.

I don't think any of Hamed's fights could be considered controversial for instance.

 

what about Bradley right now?

edit: forgot about the split decision against Witter

 

The legendary Carlos Rodriguez of course.

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=92059&cat=boxer