Has wlad done enough such that he's began a new universally accepted lineage?

Huh? WTF? What does Prescott not being "good enough" got to do with the fact that Khan is ducking him? At it seems to me that your "logic" is severly flawed seeing as Prescott was "good enough" to KO Khan in one round.

And amazingly, despite this, you rated Khan ahead of Bradley. Your logic doesn't add up.

Ahead of the guy who just beat him not too long ago? Makes LOADS of sense...

 

Huh? Are you smoking crack with the Mongoose? What does Prescott's rating matter when he owns a KO win over Khan?

Are you just pulling these excuses out of your ass as we go along?

 

Than quit pushing it on us, whitey.

 

I'm not White, crack head...

 

We seem to be diverging from the main point of the thread: whether Wlad has created a new lineage.

So...

Given that Wlad is clearly an ancient Egyptian, I'd say yes.

 

Lol...

 

Oh really...that's what they all say these days.


"I'm not White, crack head..I'm tropically adapted."

This content is protected

 

:rofl

 

Okay, with that out of the way...

I won't be completely satisfied that Wlad's the lineal champ until he beats the guy who beats Vitali. He's almost completely champion at this point, but I still have my doubts.

If worst comes to worst and the picture never clears up, I'll probably grudgingly accept him as the lineal champion in retrospect.

 

You must have added a lil bit extra Draino into your crack recipe today...

 

"You must be mixing Draino with your crack, if you can't see this man is black!"

This content is protected

 

A fair position.

ALTHOUGH... do you accept Thomas Hearns as a lineal welterweight champion? Or Roy Jones as a lineal super middleweight champion?

 

Even so, the title of this thread and the thread itself indicate that such a conclusion is not certain. And that's a shame, because it should be -for his legacy and for us.