Has Wlad done enough to establish lineage?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Cepillo, Jun 25, 2009.


  1. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    And that's ALL you need to know. Wlad is champion of PAPER until he beats the #2 HW in the world to establish a new lineage...
     
  2. ludwig

    ludwig Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,049
    59
    Apr 29, 2010
    Chagaev was clearly #2 behind the Klitschkoes when Wlad beat him. So it was fair to crown him the lineal champ at that point, though I guess that won't satisfy the haters.

    Also, arguably Wlad beat the #1 heavyweight besides him when he beat Byrd in 06 and Ibragimov in 07. By beating Ibragimov, Wlad had defeated the best heavy out there, except for maybe Sam Peter or Ruslan Chagaev...guys that Wlad had beaten or would beat.

    If you look at the WBC lineage it's clear there was no legit WBC champ after Vitali.... Maskaev was not a legit champ--he was inactive for 16 months during his so-called reign. Eventually Sam Peter got the belt....but Wlad had already beaten him.

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/WBC_Heavyweight_Champion

    Chagaev was a more legit #2 having defeated Ruiz, Virchis, and Valuev (all via SD or MD)....and Wlad beat him comprehensively. The only reason this didn't make Wlad the lineal champ in everyone's eyes is because Vitali's victory over Peter made him higher ranked than Chagaev at the time.

    Basically Wlad has done everything he could have done short of fighting Vitali to prove himself as the lineal champ. In Wlad's era, no one besides Vitali and Lennox are in Wlad's league.
     
  3. ludwig

    ludwig Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,049
    59
    Apr 29, 2010
    right.... Chagaev, Peter, and Ibragimov were on about the same level in 07 when Klitschko beat Ibragimov. While it isn't clear who was #2 before Vitali returned, it is clear that Wlad was a class above all of them.
     
  4. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    Wlad has been the man of the division since 2006, just as Holmes was since 1978.

    If you want to talk about something meaningless and old fashioned like lineage, then you have to recognize 2008 or 2009 as the years that crowned Wlad as the new lineal champ (against Sultan or Ruslan). Just like Holmes officially gained lineage in 1980 against Ali's corpse, or Charles in 1950 against old Joe Louis. Fact is that Wlad, Holmes and Charles had been the top dogs of their divisions since much before.
     
  5. FeldMunster

    FeldMunster Member Full Member

    473
    0
    Jan 6, 2007
    It's just frustrating that Wladimir is not considered the champion in some people's eyes because of a technicality. If the Ring had made only slight changes to their rankings in 2005-2008 Wlad would have fought the #2 guy. Looking back at rankings, was Peter better than Ibragimov in 2007? Hard to say. It's absolutely ludicrous though to consider him a paper champ as Nay_Sayer does.
     
  6. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    This has been my problem with the Klitschkos for quite a while now.

    Boxing is not a team sport.

    Perhaps it's just me but I'd like to see one undisputed champion who is considered the "heavyweight king".

    The Ks have always denied fans that. Neither have ever fought the other best fighter of their era (i.e. each other) and neither have been undisputed champions (either holding all the big belts or being widely considered the best).

    To me, those are two important factors in being considered truly great.

    (slighty off topic but I had to get it out.)
     
  7. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    Ironically, the same people consider 45yo old Foreman and Briggs "lineal" champs. The lineage has absolutely no credibility anymore and I am not convinced if it ever had.
     
  8. Clarkson

    Clarkson Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    0
    May 7, 2009
    Having Vitali around has seriously damaged Wlad's legacy. Without Vitali, Wlad has fought nearly all the top guys including at least 2 #2's + Povetkin next. With Vitali around Wlad hasn't fought the most dangerous opponent of the majority of his career. I don't blame him at all but Vitali being around makes a huge difference.
     
  9. Joe.Boxer

    Joe.Boxer Chinchecker Full Member

    7,605
    1,102
    Jan 8, 2011
    There's only one thing for it; Wladimir should step up - drop the bs, stop being a girl, and officially challenge his big brother to a fight.
     
  10. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    WTF?

    Do you actually take the time to read the drivel you write before pressing the send button?
     
  11. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    I expected to see this thread was a bump from 2008, but found it was only from 2009. So relevant nonetheless...
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,551
    83,403
    Nov 30, 2006
    The Transnational Boxing Rankings? The one McG is involved with?

    They don't have Wladimir as lineal? :think
     
  13. The Spider

    The Spider Guest

    Correct. Vitali was installed by most as the linear champ.
     
  14. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    :good
     
  15. FrochFan

    FrochFan Active Member Full Member

    712
    0
    Mar 3, 2011
    Nobody in their right mind thought Chagaev was the #2 heavyweight in the world.

    Its still vacant until #1 beats #2.