No, Weaver was more explosive and less predictable. Rahman is as basic as they come, he won't be able to catch Tate with his best shot
Tate was a better boxer but I don’t trust his chin or his ability to avoid disaster. I’m going with Rahman by a KO.
Rahman ko, slightly down on the cards. Tate wasn't used to fighting 240 pounders with 84 inch reach. Rahman was bad against guys who were completely dirty like Ruiz and Holyfield, but otherwise was difficult in his prime.