Hatton 2 more fights and thats it!

No, its just TFFP 'offering' to head a regime change....his manifesto is a little Draconian to say the least...

 

TFFP IS REVOLTING!!!!!:good

 

I apologise profusely.

Of course when I sober up sometime tomorow afternoon I will search the forum thoroughly for evidence to back up my assumption:nut

 

Pipe down a sec ok

All you guys get a chance to plead your case for becoming dictator before we do a vote. Its entirely democratic until the dictator is appointed.

The winner likely gets to do as they please with Emma, or appoint her princess, whatever they like. Kell Brook won't be happy, but I don't give a ****.

 

Of course!!!

 

Malignaggi and Pac, sounds good to me! :good

 

The no 1 contender at 140, and the p4p no 1 in the world sound like a good couple of fights to end on.

 

You obviously don't think much of the BHOP that fought Calzaghe judging by your comments in your latest Calzaghe hate thread.

You contradict yourself when you praise Hatton's win over KT but downplay Calzaghe's win over BHOP. Both opponents were P4P'ers regardless of age.

 

Firstly I have started no hate thread!

Secondly KT was in his 30s and Hopkins was 43. Many hardcore Calzaghe fans didn't want to see a Hopkins fight and wanted to see Joe fight a "real live" opponent. Joe looked bad against Hopkins and scraped a contentious Split decision. Hatton made KT quit on his stool. There's a difference; the manner of the victory counts.

Its a decent win for Joe but I wouldn't go overboard about it considering Bernard's age. Taylor previously beat a younger Hopkins more convincingly twice.

As I state, it's a good win for Joe, but it needs to be put into perspective.

 

What a load of b/s. JC was not exactly a spring chicken when he faced Bhops. He did a superb number on Lacy and a good job on Kessler. How many similar jobs has Hatton done ?

 

What the hell are you talking about, he was comparing the Hopkins and KT fights? I said the Hopkins fight was a good win.

 

atsch OK.

Yes KT was shot and spent more time preparing to disco dance on aussie come dancing than for the Hatton fight.

Bhops has been shot for years and was exposed by crappy taylor. People complain about Bhops running and spoiling against JC but watch the boring eastman fight and see how he runs round the ring like a big girls blouse and has the workrate of a 12 year old pit pony.

So to sum it up yes Bhops and KT were **** BUT JC beat the **** out of Lacy and Kessler. Till Hatton does likewise he will never reach the pinnacle that JC is at.

 

Really?

Hatton needs to "beat the **** out of" two guys who had no great wins between them to reach the pinnacle that Calzaghe is at?

I can't see how that makes any sense.

 

atsch atsch atsch atsch atsch atsch atsch atsch
Here we go the usual b/s how Lacy and Kessler were average opponents.

Lacy was touted as a mini tyson but Lacy fcked him up so much the guy has lost his confidence and never been the same again.

As for Kessler not having any great wins you are talking out you smelly backside. Andrade, Mundine etc were I guess all ****.

You finished your GCSE exams and back on the forum for the summer ? atsch

Yes Hatton needs to beat the **** out of a PBF, Cotto or Judah type fighter to get to the same level as JC. Currently he is no better than boxers like Lloyd Honeyghan, one win over a past prime fighter (or someone with problems outside the ring) and people like you think they are up there with the likes of JC.