Hatton, accomplished a lot, impressed nobody

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by heidegger, Dec 6, 2007.


  1. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    Hatton has fought his way to the top class of boxing by maintaining an undefeated record and establishing some wins over some big names. As a resume, Hatton looks very impressive. But look at the individual fights and the wins seem either dubious or meaningless.

    O.K. the vast majority of Pre-Tszyu fights were against bums and has-beens. None of these wins mean anything.

    But we can observe that he was knocked down aganst McGee and he didnt really look as impressive against some of his B- grade opposition as an elite fighter would. Take Ben Tackie, for example. Look at he way Tszyu put Tackie away and compare that with the Hatton fight. There is a massive difference in class here.

    The Tszyu fght was a great effort but less a great effort in boxing than strategy, hit and hold fighting, doing anything to takes in your hometown with a biased referee, (deliberately punching in the testicles and getting a soft warning) etc. Tszyu it must be said didnt look his usual self but when he could get his arms free he was landing sweet counters. In the middle rounds of the fight, the 'meat' of the fight, Tszyu won and gave glimpses of his natural superiority over Hatton. But he'd fought 6 rounds in 3 years or something, and was 35, so he clearly wasnt prepared to take 12 rounds of Hattons pressure. He got gassed and fell in a hole and was TKO'd. All in all a great, career boosting win for Hatton but because of the way he did it objective observers didn’t really credit him as much as they might have for such a big win.

    Since then, Maussa – wow. He never should have been a titilist in the first place. He won his belt with a fluke KO. Hatton looks ordinary putting away this fraud.

    Collazo – don’t need to say much about this fight. Probably should have been scored a draw. Hatton got tagged all night and knocked down in the 12th and nearly knocked out on his feat. Collazo spent too much time infighting but when he boxed he made Hatton look B grade. But anyway, the ‘new welterweight champion is…Ricky the HitMan Hatton”.

    Looked average against an old, shot, underprepared, dispirited Castilo and then landed a savage body blow. Props for the body punch, probably the most impressive hit in Hattons career.

    Hattons is truly a smoke and mirrors career – his big wins are shrouded in question marks and his other wins are meaningless.
     
  2. planetzion

    planetzion Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    0
    Jul 28, 2004
    umm yeah ...so if floyd wins he beat a b + fighter so he should get absolutley no credit then eh??
     
  3. planetzion

    planetzion Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    0
    Jul 28, 2004
    ...hatton looked ordinary putting away Maussa :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl


    he anihalated him you dip****....
     
  4. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    This is all BS. Both fighters are top notch....Good luck to both.
     
  5. planetzion

    planetzion Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    0
    Jul 28, 2004

    how so you man just outlined how Hatton is a complete no body so why would floyd get any credit for beating a nobody?? :huh :huh :huh
     
  6. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    I highly doubt Floyd will get a lot of credit when he beats Hatton. People will say he needs to fight Cotto to prove himself at welter.
     
  7. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Sorry, but you can't be overrated for losing to the best fighter in the world. Then EVERYONE would be overrated and PBF would be as well based on his beating overrated fighters.
     
  8. planetzion

    planetzion Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    0
    Jul 28, 2004

    well thats my point youve just outlined what faud hatton is so why should floyd get credit....???

    he shouldnt according to your post.
     
  9. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    Um, yeah. 'annihilate' is what Tyson did to Spinks or what Floyd did to Gatti, not what Hatton did to Maussa (KO in 9). :rofl:rofl Youre obviously and idiot.
     
  10. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    Did I say he should get credit for beating Hatton? No. stfu
     
  11. planetzion

    planetzion Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    0
    Jul 28, 2004
    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
    get on you tube and watch the KO again...it was a KTFO..

    pls **** off with your "hair splitting" definition of "anihalate"....
     
  12. planetzion

    planetzion Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    0
    Jul 28, 2004
    Did I say he should get credit for beating Hatton? No. stfu[/quote]

    from "heidegger"
    I know, if that youtube clip wass supposed to illustrate to me a weakness in Floyds game it had the opposite effect of is showed me what a genius Floyd is.


    no you didnt say it but all you other posts indicate that's where your headed.....see above
     
  13. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    Dude you cant even spell the word, I dont think youre in a position to wage a semantic argument. But taking 9 rounds to dispose of someone like Maussa, especially for a come forward type fighter like Hatton is not impressive.
     
  14. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    "All my posts indicate". So basically I never said it and youre searching my posts now to find a way to justify your stupid inference. Let me state right now that Floyd deserves no credit for beating Hatton in and by itself. If he does in impressively, maybe.
     
  15. planetzion

    planetzion Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    0
    Jul 28, 2004
    niether was going the distance with baldomere...:huh

    you can pick any fight apart if you want

    **** man just shut up and give cred where its due...your post was ******ed from the outset