Hatton and Floyd both have one loss.

Hatton beat Collazo in a close fight, could have possibly gone to Collazo but Hatton would have been robbed. Mayweather however lost a lopsided decision to JLC, yet came out victorious.

 

Lopsided decision huh, how did you score the fight?

 

Thats a very good point that people seem to forget.:thumbsup
Both fights were very close so I fail to see why there was controversy for either match.
For the record I had Hatton wining by a round and Castillo by 2 but I could easily watch 'em again and change my mind. Basically they fought to an even standard and any difference between them was purely mathamatic.

 

I thought Hatton beat Collazo and I seem to remember the post-fight polls here agreed. I scored the Castillo fight to Mayweather but it appears the majority of boxing fans feel Mayweather lost, which I can accept.

 

How some fighters bounce back from defeat may, to some extent, define greatness.

 

Get your head and shoulders out of your avatar's ass.

 

atsch

 

Floyd Mayweather Jr. 38-0

Ricky Hatton 43-0

Errrr...................Not!!!:deal

 

Even if you count the first JLC fight as a loss, big deal. The guy broke his hand in the fight, it could happen to anyone.

No one takes Vitali's loss to Byrd too seriously do they? Or McCline's loss to Briggs? Getting an injury that isnt caused by a punch and losing isn't the end of the world as far as rating fighters go.

Also, he won.

 

This is a ****ing joke, right?

No wait, judging your previous posts, you probably are actually this stupid.

 

Your total output as a poster just went down the toilet.

 

That's always been my mentality..........

Today's boxing community seems to think having a flawless record means more than fighting fellow super-talents. atsch

 

True, you see, my record was 0 and 8,123,456,930 before I made my fabulous comeback to beat my dead aunt Gertrude by SD. :happy

I'm so great...

 

"......Mayweather made him look as if he had 20 losses."