funny you call Hatton a cherry picker, when he has fought tougher fights than that of most of the guys you just listed as serious fighters
exaplain how its stupid for Hatton fans to complain about Cortez? So by your reasoning since the refs are biased for Hatton in England, then the refs should be biased against Hatton in the USA? I guess the only place anyone can get a fair fight is in Canada.
What's good for the goose should be good for the gander. They complain about Cortez, should they not have a problem with their OWN refs? And biased against Hatton for not letting him break the rules? Hmmm... Interesting. And don't bring up "Oh, Floyd uses his elbows etc...". Cause if Hatton was able to not hit and hold RIGHT in front of a refs eyes (which is almost impossible), he woulda got away with it too. I'm sure that's how his refs explain it away (that they were unable to see it)
He a took a big money win/win fight in which he had avenues of escape in the event that he lost. Neither his courage nor abilty compare to any of the men I listed.
Ricky hatton is all courage and heart Courage walking through tszyu's punches alnight to stop him The courage he showed in the last 2 rounds against collazo Courage in how many fights when his face has been near hanging off, yet he kept going forward and got the job done. You seem to know **** all about courage :bart
courage? what the **** do you know about courage if ya cant see the amount that Hatton shown in the past, you let your opinion of Hatton as a person effect your opinion of him as a fighter.
Hatton has courage, i do not dispute that. And that fight against Lazcano was competitive, a little too much. Hatton should of knocked out Juan. That ref made Hatton look bad I'm sorry mates. Not even the commentators could elaborate on the reasoning for all the yelling at Juan. Juan had not fought in over a year! imagine if he didn't have that ring rust? Bottom line... that was a bad ref, straight up. All should admit to that
oh no doubt and Hatton was in trouble in places, it was looking like when mayweather was getting to tee off on him later in their fight. thing is wont let bad calls by the ref affect my opinion if Ricky
its funny how you come up with excuses when the ref is helping the American guy but when he's helping the English guy you cry foul. And then you call the English hypocrites for doing the exact same thing as you what's good for the goose should be good for the gander, right? lol
I never said that Hatton was without courage, I said this his courage does not compare to the men listed in my previous post, which is does not. In facing Kessler Calzaghe took on a man who was the epitomy of DANGER, a fresh, young, undefeated, unified champion in his prime who, critically, was not appreciated by the heavily influential US boxing fraternity. Had Calzaghe lost his career would have been all but over, he could have easily ducked Kess and moved up to 175 there and then, but he didn't, he went for the glory. You'd never see Hatton take on an opponent that yielded such little reward for such great a risk.
For 43 fights Hatton has hit and held. And no one in Britian said a thing, despite it being ILLEGAL. Now when he comes over to America and is penalized for it, all of a sudden is cause of a bias ref? Get the **** outta here. You sound as if you think I'm a yank and feel the need to defend yanks? **** no! I just call it as i see it. Floyd's use of the elbows is like Hopkins or Holyfield... These guys were masters of doing **** on the other side of the ref, out of their view. Doesn't make it right, cause its still illegal, just makes them smart... and good. So you think Hatton should be allowed to hit and hold? I've said MANY a time, IF he was able to do it without the ref seeing it... Fine. Good on him. BUT HE CAN'T! Now your getting it! :thumbsup
Don't make it sound like Hopkins was putting on some fouling masterclass that fooled the ref. Hopkins was just plain holding and Cortez did nothing.