Hatton and Witter video

That is bull**** spread by Floyd boys. Hatton Floyd for 6 rounds and Floyd Dlh for 10 rounds were even fights. All of a sudden I hear that Floyd dominated those fights from start to finish, bull****.

 

How is it propaganda when the official judges scorecards show that Floyd was beating Hatton easily?

 

He wasnt. Judges also had Casamayor beating Santa Cruz easily. HAtton was applying pressure landing some, missing a lot, Floyd wasnt doing anything, he was waiting to see what Hatton has to offer. Then after Hatton gets his point deducted Floyd starts to open up and dominates a few rounds, Hatton reaslizes he is behing and gets careless trying to land a powerful hook and gerts countered. Its a similar pattern in many of Floys fights, he lost early rounds to Hoya, he lost early rounds to Judah.

 

I like Hatton more then Witter,but hes been clearly ducking Witter for years.Witters a dick but I'd pick him to beat Hatton.

 

I think Widow here had De La Fishnets beating Mayweather too

I wouldn't lend too much credence to his judging abilities. The Wlad sacksucking fool.

 

Oh so thats why Hatton lost. It had nothing to do with him being tactically inept & technically limited or anything.

Coming forward & not landing doesn't & shouldn't win you rounds. Mayweather beat him on the inside & out. Thats the general consensus mate & to be honest theres no discussion here. Floyd is A class & Hatton is B class. No shame in that but lets not pretend Hatton did something he didn't.

 

Wow that has to qualify as one of the worst posts this year so far. You actually thought Hatton was winning? Incredible. Absolutely incredible.:roll:atsch

 

This content is protected

 

If you ever need a good laugh, rea some of his drivel in the British forum. The guy is a joke.

You do realise that the judge are often ****? Who cares what they think? it's not absolute proof. Are you going to tell me Sven Ottke outboxed Robin Reid? Because he sure did according to the scorecards.

They don't mean as much as the general opinion. Most people think it was a lot closer than the judges had it, and they'd be right to think that.

 

hatton beats witter then&now.

 

At 147 Hatton is a C fighter "maybe" B-- at best.:yep

 

You're right there but that was not the case in this instance. Sure you could quibble over a few rounds but on the whole Mayweather was winning hands down. Come on, even Ricky hasn't whinged about the judges.

 

You're right about the first bit but Witter isn't going anywhere as much as you Hatton fans would like to see someone else do the dirty work.:good

 

Thats a pathetically feeble excuse not to put someones lights out. I smell *****.

 

Thats weak. If it was the other way around you would be all over Witter & you know it.