Hatton-Calzaghe-Hammed

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Check_Hook, Jul 30, 2010.


  1. Check_Hook

    Check_Hook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,478
    3
    Jul 23, 2010
    Who do you rate the most, based on overall achivement and resume, not popularity? and reasons
     
  2. Dr. Doom

    Dr. Doom Guest

    Hatton = Hamed > Calzaghe


    I have reasons but I just don't feel like sharing them at the moment.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,560
    21,927
    Sep 15, 2009
    hamed, he fought with a fan friednly style, always looked for the knockout, and cleaned out his division. yes he lost to mab, but all the best fighters lose fights.
     
  4. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Calzaghe > Nas > Hatton

    Loved Nas to bits. People talk about him ducking and ****. The guy cleared whatever there was when it was around. He was always a fan friendly fighter and yet he came back to fight once more in Britian on his last fight and got boo'ed horribly.
     
  5. IRONSENSE2002

    IRONSENSE2002 muslim and proud Full Member

    5,383
    1
    Jul 27, 2010
    hattons story of his life was beating Tyszu but any1 with an educated eye knows the fullstory about that
     
  6. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Talent - Hamed, Calzaghe, Hatton
    Legacy - Calzaghe, Hatton, Hamed
    Resume - Hatton, Calzaghe, Hamed

    Hamed - God given talent that should have made him go on to achieve great things. Instead he became complacent, lazy, and lacking that motivation to complement his skills. Left his career and legacy unfinished. Complete waste :verysad

    Calzaghe - Had great talent, but was too scared to test himself against the best in their primes. For a supposed ATG, his career best win is Kessler :lol:

    Hatton - Had all the heart, motivation and guts you can ask for in a fighter. A pitty he didn't have the skills to match. The two times he was matched against elite fighters, he was brushed aside emphatically. But still, at least he can retire knowing that he did try to mix it in with the best. :thumbsup
     
  7. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    in terms of legacy id go calzaghe hatton hamed

    in terms of excite,ment and stuff its the other way round
     
  8. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    4
    Mar 4, 2006
    Talent is obviously
    Hamed-Calzaghe-Hatton

    Gave me the most enjoyment following their careers then its
    Hamed-Hatton-Calzaghe
     
  9. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    In order of greatness
    1.Calzaghe
    2.Hamed
    3.Hatton

    In terms of my favorite
    1.Hamed
    2.Calzaghe
    3.Hatton
     
  10. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,152
    1
    Feb 20, 2006
    Calzaghe - Was the best at 168lbs and 175lbs. Undisputed 168lbs champion, won all the belts. Undefeated. Faced household names.

    Hamed - Should have won all the belts, awesome puncher in a weak division at the time. Was exposed against Barrera when he lost his edge.

    Hatton - Beat KT and was the man at 140lbs. Often beat up on smaller weaker opponents. Was blasted out by ATG Mayweather and MannyP.
     
  11. SomeGuy101

    SomeGuy101 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    0
    Oct 16, 2009
    lol how can Naseem be more talented than Joe when Joe was never beaten by a slugger?

    The difference is Naseem had speed - Joe has speed AND technique. A technician can slip punches; naseem relied on speed and got found wanting when presented with adequate pressure.
     
  12. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    hamed cause he cleaned out his division and never ducked anybody
     
  13. SomeGuy101

    SomeGuy101 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    0
    Oct 16, 2009
    Dude he never cleaned out the division.....Hello? Barrera! it's easier for a little guy to go up in weight than a bigger guy anyway but Hamed couldn't even clean out one division. Joe cleaned out his division and beat the 175 champ (who beat Tarver). Dawson was the only *maybe* and I think deep down most people know what woulda been a close fight.

    Im not ragging on Hamed, he was mint but P4P he isn't on Joes level. Man look how fast & technical Joe was @ 168 and how fit!!!

    If that dude dropped 44 lbs he would have been incredible.
     
  14. Slacker

    Slacker Big & Slow Full Member

    6,774
    3
    Sep 19, 2009
    :deal

    Agree with everything except " ...The two times he was matched against elite fighters, he was brushed aside emphatically."

    Pac, absolutely.

    Floyd, not so much. Ricky gets a bad deal on this fight all the time. I think everyone remembers the result, but not how Ricky dictated the pace and applied pressure in the preceding rounds. Sure, ultimately Floyd timed him perfectly and he was KO'ed, but he did a respectable job from 1-9.
     
  15. Check_Hook

    Check_Hook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,478
    3
    Jul 23, 2010
    For me its Hatton-Hamed-Calzaghe

    Hatton was a two weight world champion that fought all commers, although he lost his two biggest fights to the worlds P4P best he out of the three can at least say hes been there and had a crack, has alot of quality names on his resume.
    Hamed was all action entertainment with power to kill, a thrill to watch but again lost his biggest fight, could of showed more heart, re-matched barrera, career ended too soon.
    Calzaghe, no doubting his record, but for quality prime opposition its very poor, too late to travel to america and take risks