Hatton did ok, wtf is everyone's problem with him?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by danaconda, May 25, 2008.


  1. danaconda

    danaconda New Member Full Member

    54
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Just watched the fight again, didn't see anything different or negative about Hatton's performance. I thought he looked pretty good at 140, boxed the full 12 at a good pace and was always coming forward. Certainly looked much better than his last 3 fights.

    Personally I thought it was encouraging to see Ricky looking strong for the whole fight, something I had my doubts over. I also thought his footwork and head movement were ok for most of the fight, granted instinct took over and that sh*tty jumping left hook left him wide open a fair bit.

    But he is come forward pressure fighter, his style isn't going to change, he's going to get hit, so get over it.

    As for him being finished/in decline, well if you're using last nights fight and the fact that he took a few big shots as a basis to form that opinion, all I can say is that it's shame that you didn't give Ricky a call after he fought Thaxton or Magee to tell him he was washed up then. That way he could have saved himself the bother of becoming the linear LWW champion.

    Also I just don't see how Hatton can be overrated, currently at LWW there isn't anyone close to achieving what Hatton has. WW may be a different story, but he's not a WW so it's a pointless argument.

    All in all I have to say that the forum is pretty one-eyed when it comes to Hatton, and the majority of the vitriol comes from the US contingent, its a shame because some of the people posting know there stuff but are unable curb there bias enough to be objective.
     
  2. dannymoo99

    dannymoo99 New Member Full Member

    40
    0
    May 25, 2008
    Its just Americans who hate seeing anyone who is not American getting all the limelight. We all know how most yanks like to be centre of attention.
    If he was American they would love him.
     
  3. Undisputed P4P

    Undisputed P4P esb FBL & FIFA 12 champ Full Member

    3,368
    1
    Apr 24, 2008
    i'm english, and he looked ordinary at best.
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    I think Hatton is good but not great. I thought he had a pretty bad performance yesterday by his standards against an opponent that he would normally have dominated. He won most of the rounds clearly (11-1 on my card) but he did not dominate many rounds, and got hit flush and hard too often considering the caliber of the opponent. tbh I think that he will look better in his next fight than he did in this one.

    I don't care that Hatton is British and have nothing against British fighters. In fact Calzaghe and Haye are among my favorites.

    Also i had previously seen 7 Hatton fights, 8 now after yesterday's fight.

    Tszyu
    Oliveira
    Collazo
    Urango
    Maussa
    Castillo
    Mayweather
     
  5. Bslice

    Bslice Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,044
    5
    Sep 11, 2007
    We here at ESB are a very critical bunch, someone like Hatton can fool mere boxing mortals like yourself but can't pull the wool over the eyes of the elite boxing analysts at ESB. HAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA take that Hatton
     
  6. Arriba

    Arriba Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,148
    5
    Jun 30, 2007
    Because he was just ok against Juan Lazcano.

    That's someone he should be better than "ok" against.
     
  7. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,453
    1,713
    Nov 20, 2007
    It was boxing match. In boxing matches fighters get hit. Ricky got hit a few couple of times, a bit more than usual, and still managed to regain his LWW championship 119-109 vs. a very underrated guy (among those 70% who thought it will be an easy KO). It wasn't his best performance, but he was coming from a KO loss, his first KO loss and first pro loss to be precise, and this fight was there to bounce back - and a tough bounce-back fight.

    Some fighters just can't get away without the constant attack of the haters. If Lazcano wasn't brave and strong enough, he would've been called shot, fixed fight, C level old fighter etc.
     
  8. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    He won pretty much every single round (if not every round), against a ring top ten contender, of a fight on the back of his first ever loss in which hes was brutally TKOed; I think thats a bit better then "did OK".

    On top of that the fight was a great entertainment.
     
  9. danaconda

    danaconda New Member Full Member

    54
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    It's funny that Hatton gets critisized for everything, poor resume, no skills, over the hill......the list is endless....some of you guys think he's worse than f*ckin Eric Crumble.

    I might add that Hatton isn't a knockout merchant, he's fighting a guy who's only been ko'd once, and been in the ring with prime fighters like Castillo. Why is everyone thinking he should have bombed Lazcano out?

    He was dominant and gave a typical Hatton performance, non stop aggression, what is there to critisize?
     
  10. WiltonRoots

    WiltonRoots Member Full Member

    353
    0
    May 24, 2008
    It's a bit like when Calzaghe fought Hopkins. For the ESB armchair critics, it's a case of "damned if you do, damned if you don't".

    If Calzaghe got beaten it would have been "told you so", but he beat him and it was "B-Hop got robbed!", "B-Hop was washed up anyway".

    Doesn't matter what the end result is, the haters will still hate.
     
  11. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    A whole lot to criticize. He did not improve on his flaws and nothing he is getting worse. Hatton won rounds and struggled and was hurt badly twice. Once he was given extra time by his hometown ref. Besides that, you are supposed to look good against your tune ups.. Thats why they are tune ups. To be fair, ODH did not look good against forbes.. So there you have it. Fair and balanced criticism.
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Actually I think its pretty safe to say that most people claimed BHop was shot before the fight, and that if Calzaghe had won more convincingly noone would say Hopkins was robbed.

    What we have here is a case of a few paranoid and over-sensitive brits who think that as soon as someone criticizes a British fighter, then that person thinks all British fighters are bums and that American fighters are better just because they are American. Its really funny actually and its also a load of crap.
     
  13. danaconda

    danaconda New Member Full Member

    54
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Hmmmm not sure Hatton ever really looks good, he's a brawler and it's not pretty, but it is exciting. I think there is a lot unrealistic expectancy about what should have happened in this fight.

    BTW 'the surgeon', unfortunately I'm not fluent in the 'spastic' you wrote you're post in.

    Maybe you could draw me a nice picture, cave man style, to get your point across.
     
  14. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    The fight was meant to be a tair up between two fighters coming forward and exchanging blows non stop. It was supposed to be an exiting, entertaining tune up fight, thats why Lazcano was picked. An exiting fight is what we got, even though Hatton won by an absolute country mile.

    Some of Hattons confidence has bound to have returned...mission accomplished. Anyone who thinks Hatton is going to turn into a slick stylistic boxer is very deluded. He is what he is.

    Some boxers are destroyed by there first ever defeat, particularly pressure fighters; fair play to Hatton for making a decent comeback and making a decent entertaining fight of it at the same time.
     
  15. WiltonRoots

    WiltonRoots Member Full Member

    353
    0
    May 24, 2008
    Nah, more that some people on here provide valid points, and others are on the verge of trolling.