Hatton = Fraud

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigReg, May 3, 2009.


  1. David_TheMan

    David_TheMan ESB Sage Full Member

    5,908
    2
    Dec 31, 2007

    What does it matter what Lazcano was at lightweight, he hadn't fought for over a year. He was very small compared to Hatton, and for Hatton to be a "upper tier fighter" the fight never should have went the distance. The fact that the fight was in England is the only reason Hatton's career wasn't done then, Lazcano should have won the fight if it wasn't for pathetic referee interference.

    Scurla may believe Hatton won the fight, but I scored it for Urango.
     
  2. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
     
  3. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Then you need to learn how to score a fight properly :lol:
     
  4. K2ray

    K2ray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,040
    0
    Apr 9, 2007
    You're one brave mofo, I'll give you that:roll:...BTW, did you see the thread I started regarding your village status at ESB:lol:
     
  5. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    For a start, it matters because you called him a "blown up featherweight":patsch. I'm sorry but anyone who scored the fight for Urango can't score a fight properly.
     
  6. Club Fighter

    Club Fighter Boxing Addict banned

    4,329
    1
    Oct 12, 2005
    That's the same thing I was sayin' about Hatton in the Collazo fight.
     
  7. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    I didn't see it but I'm flattered your obsession with me continues.
     
  8. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    At least the Collazo fight was close and disputable, the Urango fight was **** easy to score.
     
  9. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    I stopped reading here. :roll:
     
  10. David_TheMan

    David_TheMan ESB Sage Full Member

    5,908
    2
    Dec 31, 2007
    At 140 Hatton could have fought, Holt, Witter, Torres, D-Hop, or Bradley. He fought none of them. He also could have fought Bailey, Corley, or Ngoudjo, but he didn't even want to fight those mid-level gatekeeper fighters in the division.

    You all can feel how you want to feel about the Urango fight, I scored for clean punches and effective aggression, not clinching.
     
  11. David_TheMan

    David_TheMan ESB Sage Full Member

    5,908
    2
    Dec 31, 2007
    No it doesn't matter, because Hatton should have been able to clearly dominate a man who had been out of the sport for over a year whose better days were clearly behind him. You can cry about my Urango score, but that doesn't make up for the pathetic showing Hatton had against Lazcano.
     
  12. K2ray

    K2ray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,040
    0
    Apr 9, 2007
    Nah, I'm almost done with the remaining HattonBots

    BTW, but do you need some more tissues:|:|:| or another pint of ale:lol:
     
  13. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,237
    6,500
    Jan 22, 2009
    Didn't he say just last week to bet the mortgage on him,and that when he wins he'll be #1 p4p?It's official.Hatton is delusional even before he got KTFO by Manny.
     
  14. K2ray

    K2ray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,040
    0
    Apr 9, 2007
    David_TheMan, GAzOC is the original village idiot when it comes to analysizing the record of the fraud Hattton.
     
  15. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    So, what your basically saying is that Hatton is a bum for fighting Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao when he could have been fighting ATG's like Ricardo Torres and Junior Witter. :lol: