Hatton is a 'Value for Money' fighter imho

I have the balls to tell the truth about my viewpoint. Please show any examples of my lack of objectivity.

 

Balls? Refusing to see the obvious isn't having balls mate, it's blind faith. You're a Hatton apologist of the highest order.

 

Yeah, because being from Manchester and being a fan exempts me from objectivity.

Another of your childish posts.

 

And with evasive reasoning like yours why even bother to post a thread on a thoroughly useless and juvenile point? If you going to try and convince me that WBU world class boxing is value you for money im telling you your a ****ing idiot. Like iv already said to you im a FAN of boxing. Therefore as a FAN i watch the channels that have BOXING on. Namely SKY. Guess what Ricky fights on SKY so naturally as a fan i tune into his fights too.What is so difficult about that to understand?:roll:

 

Its the typical yokal reasoning from Hatton joy boys. Rather than be fans of the sport there fans of fighters. No one can say a bad word about there fighter. As soon as they do there labelled as haters for actually using there brains and thinking rationale for themselves.

 

Childish, boo-hoo, I'm so hurt :|

Its seemingly the case. What other conclusions can we draw from a guy that casts a number of posters (many of which are far more objective on the subject than myself) as haters, for merely stating a valid subjective viewpoint.

He then goes on to tell us he's a huge Hatton fan that lives on his street

Come on, you've just been relegated from the halfwit division to the gutter with Sleaze.

 

A bit coincidental isnt it.. :roll:

 

What've I apologised for?

 

Oh here we go, now this is going to turn into a semantic argument. This is the usual course of events with these "debates". Come on people lets laugh this fool off the board. He's exposed himself as a fanboy anyway.

 

Quickly regarding the title of the thread I think to say he's value for money after charging £15 to fight Juan Lazcano is a bit wide of the mark here.

He used to be great to watch when he was fighting the likes of Jon Thaxton though. That fight was brutal.

 

Jesus wept, what a tool.

The internet 'gang' aren't gonna get me are they?

Come on, tell me what I've apologised for. I've pointed out the stupidity, hypocrisy and tedium of the constant sniping. I've apologised for nothing I can't defend.

 

Sorry cant take anything you say seriously anymore, your credibility diminished when you admitted to being a fanboy.:cry:

I've seen you defending his decisions, career moves, style etc in numerous threads. Infact I'd go as far as saying your only contribution to this board has been to defend Rick. It's all falling into place now.:-(

 

I watched the Castillo fight on Setanta in the £10.00 monthly bundle, with many other sports thrown in. I though that quite good value. I thought the ppv for the Mayweather fight (considering it being one of the biggest British fights for many years), and you got 24/7 clips, wasn't that bad value. I watched the Lazcano fight via stream for free.... which was a cracking little 12 round scrap...

This content is protected

:deal


All in all, doing those things, I don't feel to have got too bad value of late from Hatton. I was more disappointed with the Haye/Big Mac mismatch of a fight, and Calzaghe V Hopkins which wasn't a great spectacle (having said that I did enjoy watching some of Hopkins cagey brilliance).

All in all, apart from the Lazcano fight, I fail to see how he considerably offers less value than any other current British fighter.

 

the castillo fight?:huh nah

 

Before the knockout it weren't pretty. A lot of holding from both fighters.

Like I said all that gets overlooked because of that brutal body punch.