I disagree. The fight should be held on neutral territory so the fans and the bookmakers wont have any reason to complain either fighter had an unfair advantage.
I agree it would be a bigger fight historically but while floyds sat at home admiring his muscles this fight should be made now .
boxing is not and should not be about that . its about the crowds, the passion . There would be no unfair advantage. could anyone see this going 12 rounds anyway?
PBF vs PAC is very attractive and lucrative, BUT Hatton vs PAC promises fireworks. The casual fan would pick Ricky Hatton.
who ? floyd mayweather ? dont think there's been any indication he wants the fight yet. it would make more sense for him to fight after he he fights hatton anyway, to build manny up even more. that could all be ruined should hatton win of course.
The MGM Grand or the Mandalay would undoubtedly sell out, no? There would be passion from the fans. People say Hatton had an unfair advantage when he fought Tszyu in England. To have a level playing field and no complaints, have the fight on neutral territory.
Most casual fans here the the states I think would favor Pac based on what I"m already hearing from them. People like consistent clean punching and after the De La Hoya fight Pac made a lot of fans.
This fight would be the biggest in 2009, to be honest the fight has to happen in England or Germany because Germany and England can sell out arenas with 50,000 -100,000 capacity and in Las Vegas 30,000 is a big crowed.
I meant a Ricky HAtton fight versus a fight with PBF. I think Hatton-PAC is another Rafa-Vasquez type of battle!