who i picked was irrelevant b/c its a shitty comparison. the size factor is your biggest **** up. granted ricky is the natural 140lbr but pac & hatton are pretty much similar with overall measurements. another would be the stylistic matchup of strengths & weakness' based on previous fights. its proven that ricky has tougher time with quick southpaws where as pac favors against come forward fighters.
you had a problem with how I compared their chins, not their defense so why are you bringing that up. which reminds me, cotto had better defense than margo. anyway, is there something wrong with me saying that hatton can take harder punch than pac?
let me guess, you thought cotto was too skilled, too fast and stylistically wrong for margo. :nut stand down.
dont jump gun smartass and just listen... you said "mayweather sr improved hatton A LOT & was a different fighter against paulie" -which was simply not the mother ****ing case. 1) floyd sr & ricky only had 5-7 weeks to work together 2) hatton fought the same way he did against his all of his prev opponents. 3) after the fight ricky said himself that he didnt really show anything different but will with more time working with floyd.
i simply meant that Pac is better in the chin department. you retaliated that it was because of PBF's accurate punching that lead to the KO (check hook). I simply said it was lack of defense (a very important factor). Nothin wrong with your remarks. You have a problem with anyone saying otherwise?:hey
there was a reason why pauli was a very live 2-1 underdog against hatton. I already told you what improvements I saw in that fight. If you can't see it than I can't help you
and those improvements you mentioned (which i didnt really see) were minor and by no means was ricky a different fighter. i'm not even gonna ask you to tell me again b/c the bottom line is that floyd did NOT improve ricky A LOT, nor did he fight any differently. instead of dickriding floyd sr try watching rickys 4 prev fights and if you cant admit that you over-exaggerated NOBODY can help you.
we were talking bout this. Chin: margo had a better chin. Hatton has a better chin, has taken big shots at 140 and 147. pac has been knocked out at 110 and 113 and hurt by much smaller punchers than hatton at 130 Lets see..140-147...These are Hattons weight division (natural division if we must) for a long time. Has he ever been KO'd by a punch to the face?? YES..while moving 1 division higher. now Pac..lets just start at 122,126(supposedly his peak weight)..130..135..147. Tougher fights here. moving up multiple divisions) And he's been hit flush. not even a kd. HOw is Hatton better in the chin dept?:huh
This fight is more closer than people think, its a 50/50 pickem but on fightnight I believe it will blatantly one sided for either fighter. The difference in Pacman/Hatton and Margo/Cotto is that Margo's strengths fit perfectly against Cotto's weaknesses which any boxing fan would of noticed prior to the fight, the uppercut, a strong chin, and overwhelming stamin. Pacman/Hatton its the other way around, Pacman's strengths fit perfectly against Hatton's weaknesses, a quick/strong left, speed that is faster or atleast match that of Hatton and controlling guys that just come forward.
as much as i hate to say it as the dimented pbf fans love to say it, the turnbuckle ko'd him, the check hook just added to hattons forward momentum, who was already exhausted and dazed him enough to make him go into the ringpost.