Pacquiao was already p4p #1 you ******. If Pacquiao lost he would still have a far superior resume. It's not lineal. Hatton bullshitters.
:good Case closed... Thats why Calzaghe and Kessler could beat everyone from light heavy to heavyweight and still not be p4p number one. One can't punch properly and the other has the head movement of post accident Chris Reid (RIP).
If they beat everyone from light heavy to heavyweight highlighting one particular attribute as a reason for denying them would seem farfetched, since they are for the most part determined by resume and recent accomplishments (according to Ring anyway). If head movement is a criteria Hatton scrapes in a top million.
I have been watching Leeds Utd since 1989. I have the best side to side head movement P4P, H2H of anyone, anywhere.
Have you seen a picture of their new leader? She's not one of those nice, friendly lesbians you see in the films....
Calzaghe was only ever No1 by default (Not on my list), there was no clear P4P no1 for a few months after Mayweather retired. Hatton is not the best pound for pound fighter even with a win over Pac it isn't enough. If Hatton beat's Pacquiao then you called it right 4/5 is where he should be. I'd maybe give him no1 spot with a win over Pac and a win in a rematch with Mayweather, But that's a tall order and we've got to see how thing's go with the Pacquiao fight first. I wish Ricky would stop claiming a win over Pacquiao make's him No 1 because it makes him sound a bit thick.
p4p no1 baby yeah. :yep mosley's lost to cotto. cotto lost to margo. floyd is gone. the door is opening for that no1 slot. :deal
I'm just a bit surprised at people saying they'd have Pacman above Ricky even if Ricky beats him Makes **** all sense Roach has stated he'll campaign at 140, he just won at 147, so I'm not having this 'moving up' bollocks either